TOM SILKSTONE, INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION, UNIVERSITY OF DERBY, UK Knowledge is always subjective, intimately linked to those who both create and/or inherit it (Foucault, 2001). The curriculum reflects the nation’s values and ambitions for its young people. Its epistemologies cannot therefore be understood without accounting for the many cultural, political and economic dynamics within its design (Paraskeva, 2011). Social-reconstructionists argue that the curriculum should encourage critical consciousness to prepare students to challenge injustice by exploring the many dimensions of their experiences. They argue such injustices have been built structurally, many based on Eurocentric knowledge and culture (Andrews, 2021), and thus the curriculum is believed to instil particular views in its students that uphold these structures. Here, the notion that education is designed to maintain certain interests provides an outset through which I consider how the curriculum might be reassembled mo
‘The world can only be as equal as the knowledge that it is built upon’: Towards a curriculum of justice
Written by: Tom Silkstone
6 min read
- Andrews K (2021) The New Age of Empire: How Racism and Colonialism Still Rule the World. London: Allen Lane.
- Boaler J, Altendorff L and Kent G (2011) Mathematics and science inequalities in the United Kingdom: When elitism, sexism and culture collide. Oxford Review of Education 37(4): 457–484.
- Bobbitt F (1928) How to Make a Curriculum. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
- Christodoulou D (2014) Minding the knowledge gap: The importance of content in student learning. American Educator 38(1): 27–33.
- Eaude T, Butt G, Catling S et al. (2017) The future of the humanities in primary schools – reflections in troubled times. Education 3–13 45(3): 386–395.
- Foucault M (2001) Power/knowledge. In: Seidman S and Alexander JC (eds) The New Social Theory Reader: Contemporary debates. London: Routledge, pp. 69–75.
- Freire P (2000) Pedagogy of the Oppressed, 30th anniversary ed. New York: Continuum.
- Gherardi SA, Flinn RE and Jaure VB (2020) Trauma-sensitive schools and social justice: A critical analysis. The Urban Review 52: 482–504.
- Gibb N (2015) The purpose of education [speech]. Education Reform Summit, London, 9 July. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/speeches/the-purpose-of-education (accessed 6 April 2021).
- Gibbs BC (2014) Reconfiguring Bruner: Compressing the spiral curriculum. Phi Delta Kappan 95(7): 41–44.
- Gillborn D, Demack S, Rollock N et al. (2017) Moving the goalposts: Education policy and 25 years of the Black/White achievement gap. British Educational Research Journal 43(5): 848–874.
- Giroux HA (1985) Critical pedagogy, cultural politics and the discourse of experience. Journal of Education 167(2): 22–41.
- Gove M (2010) All pupils will learn our island story [speech]. Conservative Party Conference, Birmingham, 5 October. Available at: https://conservative-speeches.sayit.mysociety.org/speech/601441 (accessed 8 April 2021).
- Hall R and Pulsford M (2019) Neoliberalism and primary education: Impacts of neoliberal policy on the lived experiences of primary school communities. Power and Education 11(3): 241–251.
- Moncrieffe ML (2020) Decolonising The History Curriculum: Euro-centrism and Primary Schooling. Cham: Palgrave Pivot.
- Paraskeva JM (2011) Conflicts in Curriculum Theory. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
- Rudolph S, Sriprakash A and Gerrard J (2018) Knowledge and racial violence: The shine and shadow of ‘powerful knowledge’. Ethics and Education 13(1): 22–38.
- Tyler RW (1949) Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Yeandle P (2015) Citizenship, Nation, Empire: The Politics of History Teaching England, 1870–1930. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
- Young M (2014) Powerful knowledge as a curriculum principle. In: Young M, Lambert D, Roberts C et al. (eds) Knowledge and the Future School: Curriculum and Social Justice. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 65–88.