Research Projects

Discover opportunities to participate in research projects and collaborate with researchers

About the study:
The research explores the relationships between autistic traits, camouflaging (sometimes referred to as masking) and subjective wellbeing within the UK teaching population. Participants do not need to identify as autistic or believe that they have autistic traits to take part, as the study is interested in individual differences across the wider teaching population.

Eligibility:
Participants must be aged 18 or over and currently working as a qualified primary or secondary school teacher in the UK. Individuals with a formal diagnosis of autism are kindly asked not to participate.

Participation:
The study involves an anonymous online questionnaire covering background information, autistic traits, camouflaging and teacher subjective wellbeing. It takes approximately 15–20 minutes to complete. Participation is entirely voluntary, and the study has received ethical approval through the University of Wolverhampton.

Survey link:
https://wolves.questionpro.eu/t/AB3u7qzZB3wnoi

Recruitment is currently open, and I would be extremely grateful if the opportunity could be added to the member area as soon as it is convenient. I am also very happy to provide the approved recruitment advert/poster or any further documentation you require.

Deadline to take part: 30 September 2026

This article has been published as part of the Rethinking Curriculum project, kindly funded by The Helen Hamlyn Trust.

 

 

 

 

What is school belonging?

The feeling of belonging is a multifaceted and subjective concept. While it is widely recognised as a fundamental human need, associated with numerous mental, physical, social and economic benefits, it remains difficult to conceptualise and foster in practice (Allen et al., 2021). In schools, belonging can be particularly complex because it is often relational, contextual and dynamic, shaped by everyday interactions with peers, teachers, spaces and systems.

Despite its subjective nature, the most widely accepted definition of school belonging derives from Goodenow and Grady (1993) and was later adapted by Allen et al. (2018), who define it as:

‘the extent to which students feel personally accepted, respected, included, and supported by others in the school social environment’ (Allen et al., 2018, p. 2). The reference to ‘others’ highlights the wide range of individuals who contribute to pupils’ sense of belonging, including peers, teachers, parents and other significant adults (Allen et al., 2021). More recent definitions have also highlighted the importance of psychological safety. For example, Riley et al. (2020, p. 2) describe school belonging as ‘the sense of being somewhere you can be confident that you will fit in and be safe in your identity’. In this sense, belonging extends beyond simply enjoying school; it involves feeling recognised, valued, connected and supported, while being able to participate authentically within the school community.

How does wellbeing fit into this?

Like belonging, wellbeing is a complex and subjective concept. It is commonly understood as the extent to which individuals feel and function effectively across multiple domains, including their emotional, social, cognitive and physical lives (Pollard and Lee, 2003). Dodge et al. (2012) argue that wellbeing is not a fixed state but a dynamic process, shaped by the balance between individuals’ available resources and the challenges they face. Consequently, wellbeing can fluctuate over time and vary considerably between individuals. 

Belonging and wellbeing are closely interconnected and are widely regarded as mutually reinforcing. Indeed, the National Children’s Bureau (NCB) (2025, p. 6) argues that school belonging is a ‘vital’ component of pupil wellbeing, with research consistently linking stronger belonging with improved mental health and emotional wellbeing. Conversely, positive wellbeing can make it easier for pupils to form meaningful connections within their school community. Pupils who experience higher levels of wellbeing are often better equipped to form positive relationships, manage social challenges, and participate confidently in school life, all of which contribute to the development of belonging. The Education Endowment Foundation’s (EEF, 2019) research demonstrates that social and emotional learning approaches improve emotional regulation, resilience and social connection, all of which underpin a sense of belonging. As such, wellbeing should be viewed not only as an outcome of belonging, but also as a contributing factor that enables pupils to build and sustain positive relationships within school.

References

Allen K, Kern M, Vella-Brodrick D et al. (2018) What schools need to know about fostering school belonging: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review 30: 1–34.

Allen K, Kern M, Rozek C et al. (2021) Belonging: A review of conceptual issues, an integrative framework, and directions for future research. Australian Journal of Psychology, 73(1), 87–102.

Dodge R, Daly A, Huyton J et al. (2012) The challenge of defining wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing 2(3): 222-235.

Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) (2019) Improving Social and Emotional Learning in Primary Schools: Guidance Report. EEF / Early Intervention Foundation. Available at: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/guidance-reports/primary-sel (accessed on 21 July 2026).

Goodenow C and Grady KE (1993) The relationship of school belonging and friends’ values to academic motivation among urban adolescent students. The Journal of Experimental Education 62(1): 60–71.

National Childhood Bureau (NCB) (2025) Belonging Matters: Building Schools Where Every Child Thrives – A summary of the findings of a pilot programme from the National Children’s Bureau. Available at: https://www.ncb.org.uk/sites/default/files/uploads/files/Belonging%20Matters%20Final%20Summary%20Report.pdf (accessed on 21 July 2026).

Pollard E and Lee P (2003) Child Wellbeing: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Social Indicators Research 61: 59–78.

Riley K, Coates M and Allen T (2020) Place and Belonging in School: Why it Matters. National Education Union. Available at: https://neu.org.uk/sites/default/files/2023-04/Belonging%20research%20booklet.pdf (accessed on 21 July 2026).

Tools and resources  

As part of the Rethinking Curriculum project, we have created a number of bespoke resources to develop your understanding of fostering pupil belonging and wellbeing in schools. These resources are designed to explore the research evidence underpinning this approach, understand what this could look like in practice and make informed decisions about whether this might be appropriate for your school and students.

We encourage you to engage with the following:

Read our research review

This review summarises research evidence on fostering pupil belonging and wellbeing in schools, with a particular focus on its impact and implications for primary school practice.

Read this case study

Dr Jeremy Hannay, Executive Principal at Southall Waterside Federation, shares his experience of building a strong culture of belonging, trust and meaningful participation in his context, which, in turn, has promoted wellbeing for both pupils and staff.

This case study could be used to understand the process further but are not intended to be replicated as we strongly believe that all schools should be delivering for their community and circumstance

Watch this webinar

In this webinar, hosted by Well Schools, you will hear from experienced school leaders committed to enhancing the health and wellbeing of their pupils alongside supporting their academic potential. Discover how the Well School approach can improve outcomes and achievement while creating a happy, healthy culture for staff and pupils. 

Use this evaluation tool

We have created an evaluation tool for use with your school leadership teams to develop an understanding of where your current curriculum sits in relation to fostering a strong sense of pupil belonging and wellbeing. The aim of using this tool is to celebrate and acknowledge the work you are already doing, as well as to refine actions going forward. 

This tool could help with reviewing the curriculum at a whole school level, ensuring that expectations of experiences within the curriculum are relevant and catered for effectively. It could also support teacher development in the planning and application of the delivery methods.

This tool is intended to be used alongside the Rethinking Curriculum Evaluation Framework

Use this document to explore how this approach aligns with the National Curriculum and the recent Curriculum and Assessment Review.

As part of this project, schools asked for a tool to map how specific curriculum approaches aligned with the current National Curriculum in England. We have updated this to also include the most recent findings from the Department of Education's Curriculum and Assessment Review. We invite you to use this document to further develop and refine your curriculum vision.

Go further with our reading and resources list

We have created a list of further reading and resources to deepen your understanding of how to introduce and embed approaches that foster a strong sense of pupil belonging and wellbeing. These include academic research, case studies and webinars. We have ensured that all resources are either open access or available to members of The Chartered College of Teaching. 

This article has been published as part of the Rethinking Curriculum project, kindly funded by The Helen Hamlyn Trust.

 

 

 

 

Jenna Crittenden, Teacher Advocacy Lead at the Chartered College of Teaching 

Beth O’Brien, Education Content Manager at the Chartered College of Teaching

What is school belonging?

The feeling of belonging is a multifaceted and subjective concept. While it is widely recognised as a fundamental human need, associated with numerous mental, physical, social and economic benefits, it remains difficult to conceptualise and foster in practice (Allen et al., 2021). In schools, belonging can be particularly complex because it is often relational, contextual and dynamic, shaped by everyday interactions with peers, teachers, spaces and systems.

Despite its subjective nature, the most widely accepted definition of school belonging derives from Goodenow and Grady (1993) and was later adapted by Allen et al. (2018), who define it as:

‘the extent to which students feel personally accepted, respected, included, and supported by others in the school social environment’ 

                                                                                                                                                                           (Allen et al., 2018, p. 2)

The reference to ‘others’ highlights the wide range of individuals who contribute to pupils’ sense of belonging, including peers, teachers, parents and other significant adults (Allen et al., 2021). More recent definitions have also highlighted the importance of psychological safety. For example, Riley et al. (2020a, p. 2) describe school belonging as ‘the sense of being somewhere you can be confident that you will fit in and be safe in your identity’. In this sense, belonging extends beyond simply enjoying school; it involves feeling recognised, valued, connected and supported, while being able to participate authentically within the school community.

Several related concepts are often used alongside, or interchangeably with, school belonging, including connectedness, attachment, engagement, identification and bonding (Allen et al., 2018). Although these terms overlap conceptually, school belonging is generally understood as the broader construct, encompassing pupils’ feelings of acceptance, inclusion and connection within the school community.

How does wellbeing fit into this?

Like belonging, wellbeing is a complex and subjective concept. It is commonly understood as the extent to which individuals feel and function effectively across multiple domains, including their emotional, social, cognitive and physical lives (Pollard and Lee, 2003). Dodge et al. (2012) argue that wellbeing is not a fixed state but a dynamic process, shaped by the balance between individuals’ available resources and the challenges they face. Consequently, wellbeing can fluctuate over time and vary considerably between individuals. 

In schools, pupils' wellbeing is shaped by numerous complex factors, including relationships with teachers and peers, school routines, curriculum experiences and the wider school ethos. Bronfenbrenner's (1979) ecological systems theory suggests that these environmental influences interact with pupils’ individual characteristics and experiences, meaning that even pupils with similar backgrounds may experience different levels of wellbeing. Schools therefore play a significant role in promoting wellbeing through whole-school approaches that embed supportive relationships, inclusive practices and a positive learning environment (DfE, 2023). 

Belonging and wellbeing are closely interconnected and are widely regarded as mutually reinforcing. Indeed, the National Children’s Bureau (NCB) (2025, p. 6) argues that school belonging is a ‘vital’ component of pupil wellbeing, with research consistently linking stronger belonging with improved mental health and emotional wellbeing. This relationship is further supported by findings from the OECD’s PISA 2022 assessments, which show that young people with a stronger sense of belonging report greater life satisfaction and lower levels of anxiety (OECD, 2023). 

Conversely, positive wellbeing can make it easier for pupils to form meaningful connections within their school community. Pupils who experience higher levels of wellbeing are often better equipped to form positive relationships, manage social challenges, and participate confidently in school life, all of which contribute to the development of belonging. The Education Endowment Foundation’s (EEF, 2019) research demonstrates that social and emotional learning approaches improve emotional regulation, resilience and social connection, all of which underpin a sense of belonging. As such, wellbeing should be viewed not only as an outcome of belonging, but also as a contributing factor that enables pupils to build and sustain positive relationships within school.

Current context

Enhancing pupils’ sense of belonging remains a significant challenge for the education sector. Indeed, a 2020 NEU report found that one in four pupils felt they did not belong at school (Riley et al., 2020a). More recent pupil data from the Department for Education (DfE) (2025a) suggests that while there has been an increase in pupils’ feelings of belonging, experiences vary considerably across groups. Female pupils, those eligible for free school meals and pupils with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) are more likely to feel disconnected from their school community (DfE, 2025a). Similarly, Riley et al. (2020a) found that pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds are twice as likely as their more advantaged peers to feel they don’t belong and four times more likely to be excluded. 

Concerns about school belonging sit alongside wider challenges relating to pupil wellbeing. OECD PISA assessment data (2023) shows that UK pupils report some of the lowest levels of wellbeing in Western Europe, while findings from the Mental Health of Children and Young People in England 2023 survey indicate that 20 percent of children and young people aged 8 to 16 years had a probable mental health disorder (NHS England, 2023). Given the close relationship between belonging and wellbeing, these trends reinforce the need for schools to consider how they create environments where pupils feel safe, valued and connected. 

The relationship between belonging and pupils’ wider experiences of school is increasingly recognised. The DfE’s most recent Pupil Experiences in School survey (2025a) identifies belonging as closely linked to pupils’ feelings of safety, enjoyment, relationships and motivation to learn. Findings indicate that lower levels of belonging are associated with increased absenteeism and disengagement, while schools where pupils report stronger feelings of belonging have higher attendance, fewer exclusions and more positive behaviour. This suggests that belonging is not only an indicator of pupils’ individual experiences, but also a valuable measure of how effectively a school is supporting its community.

In response to these challenges, belonging, inclusion and wellbeing have become increasingly prominent within education policy. The recently revised Ofsted inspection framework (2025) introduces ‘Personal Development and Wellbeing’ as a standalone evaluation area, emphasising the need for schools to develop pupils’ confidence, resilience and emotional wellbeing while ensuring they are safe, included and able to participate fully in school life. Although the framework does not explicitly refer to ‘belonging’, it places considerable emphasis on closely related concepts, including inclusion, positive relationships and pupil safety. Similarly, the DfE (2026a) has recently updated its schools mental health and wellbeing guidance, highlighting the benefits of effective provision, including improved attendance, engagement and longer-term life outcomes. Within a wider policy context, belonging is also increasingly understood as an important measure of equity. Wider policy developments, including the White Paper (DfE, 2026b) and Curriculum and Assessment Review (DfE, 2025b), further emphasise inclusion and equitable participation. Together, these developments reflect growing recognition of belonging and wellbeing as central to improving pupil outcomes and addressing educational inequalities.

Benefits of fostering a sense of pupil belonging and wellbeing

Research evidence suggests that a strong sense of belonging and wellbeing is associated with a range of positive outcomes for pupils. These include:

  • Improved academic outcomes (Craggs and Kelly, 2018; Korpershoek et al., 2020; Riley et al., 2020a; Akar Vural et al., 2020)
  • Improved attendance (Hagenauer, 2021; Riley et al., 2020a; Sims, 2024; NCB, 2025), which has a particularly positive impact for pupils eligible for pupil premium (Sims, 2024)
  • Improved inclusion for pupils with SEND (NCB, 2025)
  • Increased pupil motivation and engagement (Korpershoek et al., 2020; Riley et al., 2020a; Kuttner, 2023)
  • Improved mental health and wellbeing (Riley et al., 2020a; Korpershoek et al., 2020; Arslan, 2018)
  • Improved sense of pupil agency (Riley, 2019; Riley et al., 2020a)
  • Reduced behaviour incidents (NCB, 2025) 

 

Fostering a strong sense of wellbeing and belonging is also linked to positive outcomes for other stakeholders, such as teachers, parents, families and the wider school community. These include:

  • Improved teacher confidence (NCB, 2025)
  • Improved teacher morale (NCB, 2025)
  • Improved rates of teacher retention (Riley et al., 2020a)
  • Increased levels of parent, carer and family involvement (NCB, 2025)
  • Increased levels of parent, carer and family trust in schools (NCB, 2025) 

 

While research consistently demonstrates that school belonging has a crucial influence on pupil outcomes (Allen et al., 2018), less is known about how schools can effectively foster belonging in practice. Furthermore, much of the existing evidence, both within the UK and internationally, focuses on secondary-aged pupils, with comparatively little research exploring the experiences of belonging among primary-aged children (NCB, 2024). Despite this, emerging insights can still serve to inform policy and practice in schools. 

What can schools do to foster pupil belonging and wellbeing?

Research consistently shows that school belonging and pupil wellbeing are shaped by a combination of relational, structural and psychological factors. Although evidence on ‘what works’ in practice, particularly in primary schools, remains limited, we have summarised emerging research and examples of effective practice below. We have also considered some of the barriers to implementation to help you think about how you might anticipate or overcome them in your own setting. 

Leadership and whole-school culture 

Effective school leadership is widely recognised as central to fostering pupil belonging and wellbeing, with evidence suggesting that intentional multi-level practices can create a climate of inclusion (Riley et al., 2020a; DfE, 2023). As Riley et al. (2020a) argue, the attitudes, systems and practices embedded within a school can either foster belonging or signal to pupils, staff and families that they are not valued. Effective leadership in this area therefore requires more than setting strategic priorities; it involves establishing a coherent whole-school culture where inclusion, relationships and wellbeing are embedded within everyday practice. 

A strong culture of belonging is characterised by shared values and consistent expectations for behaviour, relationships and inclusion, which are explicitly taught, modelled and reinforced by all members of the school community. Fair and transparent policies (Allen et al., 2018), psychologically safe environments (Slaten et al., 2016), and relational approaches to behaviour (Riley et al., 2020b) can contribute to pupils feeling valued, respected and connected. In contrast, punitive disciplinary practices, including the use of isolation rooms, may undermine pupils' fundamental need to belong, negatively affecting their wellbeing (NCB, 2024). Riley et al. (2020b) highlight that such approaches disproportionately affect historically marginalised groups, including those from disadvantaged backgrounds, Black pupils, and pupils with SEND. Instead, research increasingly supports restorative and relational approaches that prioritise trust, repair and reintegration over compliance and punishment (Riley et al., 2020b; NCB, 2024). 

The wider school environment also plays an important role in shaping pupils' sense of belonging. Schools should consider the physical spaces and less structured parts of the school day – such as breaktimes, lunchtimes and transitions – where pupils may experience greater social vulnerability (NCB, 2024). Creating welcoming, inclusive spaces and ensuring consistent adult support throughout the school day can therefore strengthen pupils' sense of safety and connection (NCB, 2024). 

To support this work, schools should also consider establishing dedicated leadership responsibility for wellbeing and belonging. The DfE (2023) recommends appointing a Senior Mental Health Lead to coordinate this work, alongside a governor with knowledge of this area to champion the agenda and provide strategic oversight. 

Importantly, a strong culture of belonging must also extend to staff as well as pupils (DfE, 2023). Research suggests that when staff themselves experience trust, respect and professional agency, they are better able to foster these conditions for pupils (Riley et al., 2020a). Similarly, meaningful partnerships with parents and carers reinforce pupils' sense of belonging by promoting consistency, trust and shared responsibility between home and school (NCB, 2024). Effective leadership must therefore be both relational and strategic, creating a culture where pupils, staff and families alike feel recognised, valued and connected. 

Pupil–teacher relationships

The quality of pupil–teacher relationships is understood to be one of the strongest determinants of school belonging (Allen et al., 2018; Riley et al., 2020a; NCB, 2024). These relationships are often characterised by mutual care, respect, support, empathy and encouragement, alongside academic support (Allen et al., 2018; NCB, 2024). Evidence also suggests that teachers’ interpersonal skills are particularly crucial: empathy (Cai et al., 2022), active listening (Allen et al., 2021), and fair, respectful treatment of pupils (Allen et al., 2018; 2021) all contribute to stronger feelings of belonging. 

Beyond relational dispositions, classroom-based interventions and pedagogical practices also play a significant role in strengthening teacher–pupil relationships. The quality of classroom dialogue appears particularly important. For example, Faughey (2019) demonstrates how conversations that acknowledge and celebrate cultural difference can enhance inclusion, while García and Dutro (2018) demonstrate the value of honest and supportive dialogue around sensitive issues such as migration and bereavement. More broadly, research suggests that teacher-led approaches are most effective when they explicitly support pupils’ social and emotional development (Korpershoek et al., 2016; Allen et al., 2023).

However, teachers’ ability to build and sustain these relationships can be challenging. Teachers may feel underprepared or uncomfortable addressing sensitive or controversial issues, highlighting the need for sustained, high-quality professional development that builds confidence, knowledge and pedagogical skill (Davies, 2025). Alongside this, workload and accountability pressures – including administrative demands and an increased emphasis on external testing – can reduce opportunities for meaningful interactions (NCB, 2024). Supportive leadership teams are therefore critical in creating the conditions in which teachers can flourish (Riley et al., 2020a), by protecting time, supporting professional development and recognising relational practice as central to fostering pupil belonging. 

Curriculum

A curriculum that fosters belonging requires consideration of both what is taught and whose knowledge is represented. This involves challenging stereotypes and problematic historical narratives that may alienate pupils, particularly in subjects such as English, geography, and history (Quigley, 2026). It also requires intentionally embedding perspectives and examples from communities that are often marginalised or overlooked across subject areas, rather than treating them as tokenistic ‘add-ons’ (Brett and Brassington, 2023; Griffiths et al., 2024; Davies, 2025). However, educators must be mindful of what Mcfarlane (2024) refers to as the ‘visibility paradox’, where attempts to celebrate difference can inadvertently reinforce marginalisation if not handled carefully. Developing staff expertise through sustained professional development – whether internally or via external expertise – is therefore essential, alongside protected time for teachers to reflect critically on representation within the curriculum (Davies, 2025). 

Belonging can also be shaped through pedagogy. Teachers’ everyday classroom decisions can influence whether students feel included, valued and able to participate. Classroom approaches that emphasise learning processes, improvement and collaboration, rather than comparison and performance, are associated with stronger feelings of belonging (Allen et al., 2018; Korpershoek et al., 2020). Formative assessment practices can also support inclusion by positioning mistakes as opportunities for learning; for example, whole-class feedback allows teachers to address misconceptions without singling out individual pupils (Morgan et al., 2023; Quigley, 2026).

Classroom dialogue is another important mechanism through which belonging can be fostered. Research indicates that high-quality classroom dialogue can improve conceptual understanding, confidence and self-efficacy, while structured talk routines and active listening strategies support equitable participation and help pupils feel heard (Mercer, 2008; Mercer and Howe, 2012; Alexander, 2020). However, Mercer (2008) also notes that such approaches need to be carefully scaffolded so all pupils can meaningfully participate in collaborative discussion, thus avoiding further exclusion. 

Other key approaches include flexible and frequently rotating grouping structures to reduce fixed labels and exclusion (Quigley, 2026). More broadly, whole-school approaches, including strengthening literacy provision, can further promote belonging and wellbeing by improving access to the curriculum for all pupils (Griffiths et al., 2024). 

Pupil voice and agency

Pupil voice is increasingly recognised as a key mechanism for strengthening belonging. Pupils are more likely to feel connected to school when they believe their views influence decisions that affect them (Riley et al., 2020a). Meaningful participation can also support wellbeing by developing confidence, self-esteem, independence and relationships with peers and staff (DfE, 2023). As the NCB (2024, p. 42) emphasises, ‘the voices of pupils… can be a powerful tool to inform inclusive practice; they know best what is affecting them, whether positively or adversely’. 

However, meaningful pupil participation extends beyond consultation; pupils must have a genuine level of influence over decisions. As Davies (2025) notes, superficial attempts can undermine trust and weaken, rather than strengthen, belonging. Effective approaches include school councils, surveys, focus groups and the co-creation of curricula and initiatives, alongside informal opportunities for pupils to share their experiences. At the same time, evidence cautions against placing the burden of representation on individual pupils to speak for entire identity groups, which can be reductive and inequitable (Davies, 2025). Instead, the goal is to create ongoing, psychologically safe channels for participation that acknowledge diversity of experience and allow multiple perspectives to be heard. Importantly, it often takes time for pupils to develop confidence that their contributions will lead to visible change, meaning that responsiveness from staff is critical in building credibility.

Measurement and monitoring 

Effective measurement and monitoring support schools to understand pupils’ experiences, identify patterns and target support. However, there is currently no universally agreed ‘gold standard’ measure of school belonging or wellbeing (Allen et al., 2021, p. 91). Indeed, current approaches to measurement remain fragmented. Franklin et al. (2024) highlight that measurement activity in schools in England is inconsistent, limiting the ability of practitioners and policymakers to build a clear understanding of children’s wellbeing.

However, there are a number of tools that can be used to capture different aspects of pupils’ experiences, including the Psychological Sense of School Membership scale (PSSM) (Goodenow and Grady, 1993) – which has demonstrated reliability across different cultural contexts, including among primary-aged pupils (NCB, 2024) – and the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) belonging measures (OECD, 2023). However, these measures vary in focus and do not always capture key relational factors that contribute to pupils’ experiences of belonging. The DfE (2023) also recommends a toolkit produced by Mentally Healthy Schools to support the monitoring of pupil wellbeing, alongside the Stirling Children’s Wellbeing Scale, which is suitable for measuring emotional wellbeing in children aged 8 to 15 years.

There is growing support for a universal wellbeing measurement in England (Franklin et al., 2024). Indeed, the DfE (2025a) now routinely collects data on pupils’ experiences of belonging, safety and enjoyment through its annual pupil survey, while Gross (2026) argues that schools need to ‘operationalise the concept’ of belonging through practical measures, such as a Belonging Index, to inform self-evaluation and improvement planning. In the absence of a single agreed measure, the NCB (2024) recommends adapting existing tools to reflect the needs of each school community.

Other factors influencing belonging and wellbeing

Several additional factors can contribute to pupils’ sense of belonging and wellbeing, including:

Parental involvement can strengthen pupils’ connection with school. Research suggests that parental emotional support, encouragement and positive attitudes towards learning are associated with stronger feelings of school belonging (Allen et al., 2018). Schools can support this by developing meaningful partnerships with families; ensuring communication between home and school is effective; involving parents in school life; and clearly communicating available wellbeing support (Allen et al., 2018; DfE, 2023). 

Extracurricular opportunities can also enhance pupils’ sense of connection and belonging by providing additional opportunities to develop relationships, explore interests and participate in the wider school community (Allen et al., 2018). However, evidence suggests that participation needs to be meaningful and balanced, as simply increasing involvement does not automatically lead to improved belonging (Slaten et al., 2016). The DfE’s (2026c) recently published Enrichment Framework provides non-statutory guidance to support schools in designing, delivering and evaluating a high-quality enrichment offer for all pupils.

Peer relationships are another important influence on pupils’ experiences of school. Friendships characterised by trust, care and openness are associated with stronger feelings of belonging and wellbeing (Allen et al., 2018). However, research highlights that belonging is not simply about being part of a friendship group or social ‘clique’; rather, it depends on the quality and authenticity of relationships (Riley et al., 2020a). Schools can therefore support belonging through inclusive classroom practices, effective anti-bullying approaches and opportunities for pupils to build meaningful connections. While peer relationships are important, and increasingly influential during adolescence, evidence suggests that supportive relationships with teachers remain one of the strongest predictors of belonging across age groups (Allen et al., 2018).

Practical implications for schools

Belonging and wellbeing are contested and complex concepts. While evidence demonstrates their importance for pupil outcomes, further UK-based research is needed, particularly in primary schools, to better understand how schools can effectively foster belonging in practice (NCB, 2024). Nevertheless, existing research provides a valuable foundation for school leaders and teachers.

As with any approach, there are numerous ways in which it can be implemented, depending on the unique characteristics of a school’s context and its pupils. When thinking about enhancing belonging and wellbeing it your school, it may be helpful to consider the following takeaways from the research findings to inform your approach:

  • Develop a shared understanding of key terms. Belonging and wellbeing are complex, dynamic and subjective concepts. Although distinct, they are closely interconnected and mutually reinforcing. Ensure that pupils, staff and the wider school community have a shared understanding of what these concepts mean, why they matter and how they are reflected in school life. 
  • Make belonging a strategic priority. Belonging should be embedded within school improvement planning, curriculum, pedagogy and culture rather than viewed solely as a pastoral responsibility. Stronger belonging is associated with improved attendance, behaviour, engagement, mental health and academic outcomes.
  • Adopt a whole-school approach. Belonging and wellbeing are strengthened when they are consistently promoted through leadership, relationships, policies, the curriculum and the wider school environment, rather than through isolated, one-off interventions. 
  • Prioritise positive relationships. Strong, trusting relationships between pupils and staff are among the most important predictors of school belonging. Leaders should create conditions that allow staff time and support to build these relationships.
  • Review behaviour policies through a relational lens. Restorative and relational approaches are more likely to promote belonging than punitive practices, particularly for disadvantaged pupils and those with SEND.
  • Design an inclusive curriculum. Ensure that curriculum content reflects diverse perspectives, challenges stereotypes and enables all pupils to see themselves represented, while using pedagogy that promotes collaboration, dialogue and participation.
  • Give pupils a meaningful voice. Involve pupils in genuine decision-making through surveys, councils and co-creation of the curriculum, ensuring that feedback leads to visible action and builds trust.
  • Measure and monitor belonging and wellbeing. Collect and use pupil voice and wellbeing data to identify trends, target support and evaluate improvement. Regular measurement should inform school development rather than become a compliance exercise.
  • Prioritise equity and inclusion. Recognise that some groups, including pupils eligible for free school meals and pupils with SEND, are more likely to experience lower levels of belonging. Strategies should therefore be designed with equity at their core.
  • Enhance staff wellbeing. Staff who feel trusted, valued and supported are better able to foster belonging for pupils. A culture of belonging should therefore extend to adults as well as children.
  • Work in partnership with families. Strong relationships with parents and carers reinforce pupils' sense of belonging and create greater consistency between home and school, improving wellbeing and engagement.

 

References

Allen K, Kern M, Vella-Brodrick D et al. (2018) What schools need to know about fostering school belonging: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review 30: 1–34.

Allen K, Kern M, Rozek C et al. (2021) Belonging: A review of conceptual issues, an integrative framework, and directions for future research. Australian Journal of Psychology, 73(1), 87–102. 

Allen K, Berger E, Reupert A et al.(2023) ‘Student-Identified Practices for Improving Belonging in Australian Secondary Schools: Moving Beyond COVID-19’, School Mental Health, 15, 927–939.

Akar Vural R, Donmez B, Guven H, and Gundogdu K (2020) A cross-sectional study of eight graders’ sense of school belonging, subjective wellbeing, and academic achievement. Bulletin of Educational Research, 42, 93–116.

Alexander R (2020) A Dialogic Teaching Companion. London: Routledge.

Arslan, G. (2018) Exploring the association between school belonging and emotional health among adolescents. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 7: 21–41.

Brett A and Brassington J (2023) Pride and Progress: Making schools LGBT+ Inclusive Spaces. London: Corwin UK.

Bronfenbrenner U (1979) The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cai Y, Yang Y, Ge Q et al.(2022) The interplay between teacher empathy, students' sense of school belonging and learning achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education 38: 1167–1183. 

Craggs H and Kelly C (2018) ‘School belonging: Listening to the voices of secondary school students who have undergone managed moves’, School Psychology International 39(1): 56–73.

Davies L (2025) Beyond the tick-box: Diversity in the curriculum. Impact 25. Available at: https://my.chartered.college/impact_article/beyond-the-tick-box-diversity-in-the-curriculum/ (accessed on 21 July 2026).

Department for Education (DfE) (2023) Promoting children and young people’s mental health and wellbeing: A whole school or college approach. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/614cc965d3bf7f718518029c/Promoting_children_and_young_people_s_mental_health_and_wellbeing.pdf (accessed on 21 July 2026).

Department for Education (DfE) (2025a) Pupil experiences in school: Academic year 2024-2025. UK Government. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/692745719c1eda2cdf034145/Pupil-experiences-in-school-2024-to-2025-academic-year.pdf (accessed on 21 July 2026).

Department for Education (2025b) Curriculum and assessment review final report: Building a world-class curriculum for all. UK Government. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/690b96bbc22e4ed8b051854d/Curriculum_and_Assessment_Review_final_report_-_Building_a_world-class_curriculum_for_all.pdf (accessed on 21 July 2026).

Department for Education (DfE) (2026a) Promoting and supporting mental health and wellbeing in schools and colleges. UK Government. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/promoting-and-supporting-mental-health-and-wellbeing-in-schools-and-colleges#mental-health-behaviour-and-attendance (accessed on 21 July 2026).

Department for Education (2026b) Every child achieving and thriving: Reforms to the schools and SEND systems in England to ensure that every child can achieve and thrive. UK Government. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69ef4958ed93f72cf816341a/Every_Child_Achieving_with_Correction_-_WEB.pdf (accessed on 21 July 2026).

Department for Education (2026c) The enrichment framework for schools and colleges. UK Government. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-enrichment-framework-for-schools-and-colleges (accessed on 22 July 2026).

Dodge R, Daly A, Huyton J et al. (2012) The challenge of defining wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing 2(3): 222-235.

Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) (2019) Improving Social and Emotional Learning in Primary Schools: Guidance Report. EEF / Early Intervention Foundation. Available at: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/guidance-reports/primary-sel (accessed on 21 July 2026).

Faughey D (2019) Cosmopolitan Conversations in a Multicultural and Multilingual Classroom, English Journal 109: 74–81.

Franklin J, Prothero C and Sykes N (2024) Charting a happier course for England’s children: The case for universal wellbeing measurement. Pro Bono Economics. Available at: https://pbe.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/read-the-report-2779dc06.pdf (accessed on 21 July 2026).

Garcia A and Dutro E (2018) Electing to Heal: Trauma, Healing, and Politics in Classrooms. English Education 50: 375–383.

Goodenow C and Grady KE (1993) The relationship of school belonging and friends’ values to academic motivation among urban adolescent students. The Journal of Experimental Education 62(1): 60–71.

Gross J (2026) How to measure pupils’ sense of belonging in schools. Tes. Available at: https://www.tes.com/magazine/teaching-learning/general/how-can-schools-measure-pupils-sense-of-belonging (accessed on 21 July 2026).

Griffiths J, Greany T, Penacchia J et al. (2024) Belonging schools: How do relatively more inclusive secondary schools approach and practice. Impact 24. Available at: https://my.chartered.college/impact_article/belonging-schools-how-do-relatively-more-inclusive-secondary-schools-approach-and-practice-inclusion/ (accessed on 21 July 2026).

Hagenauer G, Wallner-Paschon C and Kuhn C (2021) Austrian students’ experiences of supportive relationships with teachers, peers, and parents and the mediating effect of school belonging in the context of their academic and non-academic outcomes. Zeitschrift für Bildungsforschung 11: 93–116. 

Korpershoek H, Harms T, de Boer H et al. (2016) A meta-analysis of the effects of classroom management strategies and classroom management programs on students’ academic, behavioral, emotional, and motivational outcomes. Review of Educational Research 86(3): 643–680. 

Korpershoek H, Canrinus E , Fokkens‑Bruinsma M et al. (2020) The relationships between school belonging and students’ motivational, social‑emotional, behavioural, and academic outcomes in secondary education: A meta‑analytic review. Research Papers in Education 35(6): 641–680.

Kuttner, P (2023) The right to belong in school: A critical, transdisciplinary conceptualization of school belonging. AERA Open 9: 1–12.

Macfarlane R (2024) The A–Z of Diversity & Inclusion. Woodbridge: John Catt Educational.

Mercer N (2008) The seeds of time: Why classroom dialogue needs a temporal analysis. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 17(1): 33–59.

Mercer N and Howe C (2012) Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 1(1): 12–21.

Morgan A, Pennington H and Milton E (2023) Key considerations essential to developing a curriculum that supports learners’ mental health and wellbeing. Impact 18. Available at: https://my.chartered.college/impact_article/key-considerations-essential-to-developing-a-curriculum-that-supports-learners-mental-health-and-wellbeing/ (accessed on 21 July 2026).

National Childhood Bureau (NCB) (2024) School Belonging: A literature review by Goldsmith’s University on behalf of the National Childhood Bureau. Available at: https://www.ncb.org.uk/sites/default/files/uploads/attachments/School%20Belonging%20-%20A%20Literature%20Review%202024_2.pdf (accessed on 21 July 2026).

National Childhood Bureau (NCB) (2025) Belonging Matters: Building Schools Where Every Child Thrives – A summary of the findings of a pilot programme from the National Children’s Bureau. Available at: https://www.ncb.org.uk/sites/default/files/uploads/files/Belonging%20Matters%20Final%20Summary%20Report.pdf (accessed on 21 July 2026).

NHS England (2023) The Mental Health of Children and Young People in England 2023: headline findings. Available at: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/mental-health-of-children-and-young-people-in-england/2023-wave-4-follow-up# (accessed on 21 July 2026).

OECD (2023) PISA 2022 Results (Volume II): Learning During – and From – Disruption. OECD Publishing. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/12/pisa-2022-results-volume-ii_222a5ef6/a97db61c-en.pdf (accessed on 21 July 2026).

Ofsted (2025) Education inspection framework: for use from November 2025. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/education-inspection-framework-eif/education-inspection-framework-for-use-from-november-2025 (accessed on 21 July 2026).

Pollard E and Lee P (2003) Child Wellbeing: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Social Indicators Research 61: 59–78.

Quigley A (2026) The Challenge of Belonging. In: Alex Guigley’s Blog. Available at: https://alexquigley.co.uk/the-challenge-of-belonging (accessed on 21 July 2026).

Riley K (2019) Agency and belonging: What transformative actions can schools take to help create a sense of place and belonging? Educational and Child Psychology 36: 91-104.

Riley K, Coates M and Allen T (2020a) Place and Belonging in School: Why it Matters. National Education Union. Available at: https://neu.org.uk/sites/default/files/2023-04/Belonging%20research%20booklet.pdf (accessed on 21 July 2026).

Riley K, Coates M and Allen T (2020b) Belonging, Behaviour and Inclusion in School: What does the research tell us? National Education Union. Available at: https://neu.org.uk/sites/default/files/2023-04/Belonging%20research%20Literature%20Review.pdf (accessed on 21 July 2026).

Sims C (2024) The drivers behind attendance: What we are learning about the importance of belonging, engagement, sanctions and support. Impact 20. Available at: https://my.chartered.college/impact_article/the-drivers-behind-attendance-what-we-are-learning-about-the-importance-of-belonging-engagement-sanctions-and-support/ (accessed on 21 July 2026).

Slaten C, Ferguson J, Allen K et al. (2016) School belonging: A review of the history, current trends, and future directions. The Educational and Developmental Psychologist 33(1): 1–15.

This article has been published as part of the Rethinking Curriculum project, kindly funded by The Helen Hamlyn Trust.

 

 

 

 

This is a collection of research articles, case studies, webinars and other relevant resources to develop your understanding of fostering a greater sense of belonging and wellbeing in your setting. We have ensured that these are open access or available to members of The Chartered College of Teaching. 

The resources collated here are not designed to provide a recipe for what you should do. Some of the articles will also present opposing viewpoints, and ones which may contradict your own viewpoint or experience. They aim to provoke thought, debate and discussion. We encourage you to read and appraise the literature to make informed decisions based on your local context, professional experience and other available research evidence. 

Resources from the Chartered College of Teaching

N.B. Please note that non-members can only access three articles per month. Join today to get full access to all resources provided on our platform.

This article argues that diversity work too often becomes tokenistic when treated as a bolt‑on rather than embedded across everyday teaching, creating risks of both hyper‑visibility and invisibility for minoritised pupils. It urges schools to ‘usualise’ representation, build staff confidence through sustained CPD, and centre student voice without placing the burden of representation on those students: Beyond the tick-box: Diversity in the curriculum : My College 

ImpactEd’s research across 200+ schools finds that a sense of belonging and school engagement are strong, context‑specific drivers of attendance, especially for disadvantaged pupils and those with SEND. The study recommends focusing on teacher–student relationships, wellbeing, tailored support for Key Stage 4 pressures, and clearer, fairer reward systems to improve attendance: The drivers behind attendance: What we are learning about the importance of belonging, engagement, sanctions and support : My College 

The article argues that narrowing attainment gaps requires combining high‑quality universal teaching with targeted, evidence‑based interventions and system‑level supports, emphasising curriculum sequencing, formative assessment, scaffolding, and timely extra help so all pupils can access ambitious learning: Levelling the playing field of learning 

The article argues that a strong sense of belonging is foundational to pupils’ wellbeing, engagement, attendance, and attainment, and that schools should prioritise relational practices, inclusive routines, and student voice to create environments where every child feels known and valued: The importance of belonging

The article argues that an inclusive curriculum, through diversified content, culturally sensitive pedagogy, and relational routines, helps students feel a sense of belonging and connection, which in turn supports engagement, wellbeing, and learning: Enabling students to feel a sense of belonging and connection through an inclusive curriculum : My College 

The article argues that a strong sense of belonging is essential for inclusive schools and underpins pupils’ wellbeing, engagement, attendance, and achievement: Belonging in school: Creating an inclusive environment : My College 

Research shows that improving student wellbeing delivers wide‑ranging benefits for attendance, engagement, behaviour, and attainment, but these gains depend on how wellbeing is implemented rather than whether it’s endorsed: Student wellbeing: Research shows that the benefits are far-reaching, but implementation is key to success : My College 

The article outlines practical, whole‑school strategies for promoting positive mental health in primary schools, arguing that wellbeing should be taught explicitly, embedded in routines, and supported by strong teacher–pupil relationships: Promoting positive mental health and wellbeing in primary schools 

The article outlines practical principles for designing a curriculum that supports pupils’ mental health and wellbeing, arguing that wellbeing should be explicitly taught and woven through subject learning, pastoral systems, and whole‑school routines: Key considerations essential to developing a curriculum that supports learners’ mental health and wellbeing: My College 

The article argues that a whole‑child approach, integrating academic learning with wellbeing, social‑emotional development, physical health, and strong relationships, is essential for schools to enable sustained learning and equity; it calls for curriculum, assessment, leadership, and community partnerships to be aligned so every child’s broader needs are met alongside academic ambition: Why whole-child development is essential for schools : My College 

The piece explains the Five Ways to Wellbeing (connect, be active, keep learning, give, take notice) and offers practical, low‑cost strategies teachers can use to help pupils maintain mental health while learning at home, emphasising simple daily actions that boost resilience and routine: Supporting student wellbeing by encouraging them to use the ‘Five Ways to Wellbeing’ (while staying at home!) : My College 

The article argues that prioritising teacher wellbeing is essential for optimal student outcomes because supported, resilient teachers are better able to build relationships, manage classrooms, and deliver high‑quality instruction: Supporting teachers to support learners: Prioritising teacher wellbeing for optimal student outcomes : My College 

This article argues for embedding creative pedagogies within the curriculum as a means of improving pupil mental health: A joyful curriculum: Embedding creative practice to support pupils’ mental health : My College 

This case study explores whether a simple, embedded creative routine could offer a low-burden, inclusive approach to supporting emotional regulation and readiness to learn within a mainstream classroom: Calm through creativity: Embedding daily creative habits to foster emotional regulation and wellbeing in primary classrooms 

Reports and original research around belonging and wellbeing in schools

This DfE paper contains an overview of the Education for Wellbeing Programme trials, the interventions tested, the evaluation methods used and the key findings on what did and did not improve mental health and wellbeing in schools: Education for wellbeing programme findings - GOV.UK 

This DfE report identifies the key family, school and individual factors that most strongly shape primary pupils’ attainment and wider educational outcomes, highlighting the powerful influence of early disadvantage and the importance of high‑quality teaching, stable home environments and positive school experiences: Factors influencing primary school pupils’ educational outcomes 

This literature review, produced by the National Children’s Bureau, synthesises evidence demonstrating that a strong sense of school belonging—fostered through positive relationships, inclusion and meaningful participation—is a powerful predictor of pupils’ wellbeing, engagement and academic outcomes: School Belonging - A Literature Review 2024. Summary available here: Understanding and enhancing school belonging: Launching our literature review 

This Teach First-funded research examines six secondary schools across England which are achieving relatively good outcomes for both inclusion and attainment. From this, the report provides practical examples of how leadership, pastoral support, student voice, curriculum, behaviour approaches and community partnerships can work together to create an inclusive school culture: Belonging Schools How do relatively more inclusive secondary schools approach and practise inclusion? 

This report presents the findings of a pilot programme from the National Children’s Bureau. The findings demonstrate how a whole-school approach can strengthen pupils’ sense of belonging, with improvements in pupils feeling connected, valued and safe, particularly among pupils with SEND: BELONGING MATTERS: BUILDING SCHOOLS WHERE EVERY CHILD THRIVES 

This NEU report highlights how intentional whole-school approaches can strengthen pupils’ sense of belonging by creating environments where they feel welcomed, valued, connected and included. It emphasises the importance of building positive relationships, creating a supportive school culture and giving pupils meaningful opportunities to participate, particularly in challenging contexts: Creating a sense of place and belonging in schools | National Education Union

This British Council report takes a global perspective on inclusion and belonging, bringing together research and case studies from contexts including India, Nigeria, Kenya, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iraq and South Africa. It highlights how leadership, alongside context-specific approaches to SEND, gender equality and language, can create schools where all learners feel valued, included and able to participate: Leading Inclusion and Belonging in Schools 

The Pro Bono Economics report makes the case for universal wellbeing measurement for children and young people, arguing that better data could help identify changes in wellbeing earlier and inform more effective policy and support: Charting a happier course for England’s children: the case for universal wellbeing measurement 

This research article, written by Allen et al., provides a large-scale meta-analysis of 51 studies involving 67,378 students, examining the factors associated with school belonging. The findings suggest that schools can strengthen belonging through positive relationships, supportive teaching and changes to school policies, systems and practice: What Schools Need to Know About Fostering School Belonging: a Meta-analysis 

This UCL research project explores how schools can become places of belonging, emphasising the role of relationships, identity, agency, leadership and the environment. It provides practical tools, research and case studies to help school leaders and staff to create more welcoming, connected and empowering school communities: Creating Place and Belonging in Schools 

Resources to support schools' approach to fostering a greater sense of belonging and wellbeing

This DfE guidance provides an evidence-based framework for promoting mental health and wellbeing through a whole-school or college approach, covering leadership, school culture, staff wellbeing, teaching and learning, student voice, targeted support and working with families: Promoting and supporting mental health and wellbeing in schools and colleges 

This resource, produced by University of Cambridge, introduces the Cambridge Wellbeing Check, alongside a bank of practical resources for teachers and school leaders. These tools support schools to monitor pupils’ wellbeing, identify where additional support may be needed, and inform effective whole-school approaches to wellbeing: What is Wellbeing in schools? 

Well Schools is a national movement supporting schools to embed wellbeing at the heart of education through a whole-school framework, practical tools, training and a community of support. Schools can begin with the free Well Check self-review tool and progress through further resources and Well Schools Accreditation to support continuous improvement in pupil and staff wellbeing: Well Schools - Youth Sport Trust 

This NHS-approved, teacher-developed assembly resource introduces KS1 and KS2 pupils to physical and mental wellbeing, helping them understand what wellbeing means and the everyday actions they can take to support it: What is wellbeing? – KS1 and KS2 assembly 

Barriers to Education is a comprehensive, practitioner‑led resource that explains why young people struggle to attend school and offers the WARMTH framework, an inclusive, relational, wellbeing‑first approach, alongside practical tools and lived‑experience insights to help schools remove barriers and support every learner to thrive: Welcome to Barriers to Education 

Place2Be supports teachers and school leaders to promote positive mental health through practical resources, training and expert guidance, helping them build whole-school approaches to wellbeing: Place2Be 

The Parents Promise Education Initiative provides schools with practical, child‑centred resources to help pupils affected by parental separation feel safe, understood and supported, while promoting a whole‑school culture of healthy relationships and reduced conflict: The #ParentsPromise - Education Initiative 

This article outlines practical, research‑informed ways schools can assess pupils’ sense of belonging using simple surveys, relational indicators and pupil‑voice tools, while warning that belonging is best understood through multiple measures rather than a single score: How to measure pupils' sense of belonging in schools | Tes 

No Outsiders is an inclusion programme that equips schools to teach equality, community cohesion, and respect so every child knows they belong: No-outsiders. They have also produced a film around the idea of having a human library to build understanding and belonging: The Human Library at The Meadows 

The Wellbeing Award for Schools, developed by the National Children’s Bureau and Optimus Education, recognises the outstanding work being done to promote mental health and wellbeing within school communities across England. They provide an evidence-informed framework for schools to embed mental health and wellbeing into everyday school life, supporting whole-school self-reflection, strategic planning and culture change: Wellbeing Award for Schools 

EmpathyLab’s Empathy Schools programme helps children build empathy, literacy, and social action through a whole‑school, research‑informed approach: Empathy Schools – EmpathyLabUK 

The PHSE association is a membership association and charity supporting over 50,000 teachers and schools with lesson plans, training, guidance and advice covering statutory RSHE: PHSE association 

Mentally Healthy Schools provides quality-assured mental health resources, information and guidance for schools and further education settings across the UK: Mentally Healthy Schools. They also provide a wellbeing measurement framework for primary schools.

This resource, produced by the University of Cambridge, offers tools that schools and educators can use to revise or develop policies for educational inclusion, particularly as they pertain to learners with neurodevelopmental differences: Introducing Belonging in School: a school-level resource for developing inclusive policies 

This guidance report, produced by the Australian Education Research Organisation (AERO), synthesises evidence on how primary schools can strengthen pupils’ sense of belonging and connectedness. It provides practical support for school leaders seeking to embed inclusive approaches into everyday classroom and whole-school practice. While developed in an Australian context, the evidence and recommendations have clear relevance for primary schools in the UK: Encouraging a sense of belonging and connectedness in primary schools 

Boards for Education provide a range of practical resources to support school governors in championing pupil mental health and wellbeing across the whole school: Pupil wellbeing – resources for school governors 

The National Governance Association’s guidance supports governing boards to understand their responsibilities for pupil mental health and wellbeing, including adopting a whole-school approach, monitoring impact and access to specialist support: Pupil Wellbeing & Mental Health 

Connected Belonging provides schools with practical tools to strengthen wellbeing through a relational and identity-focused approach, including an audit tool, implementation planner and activity ideas: Connected Belonging: Resources for Schools 

Blogs and news articles 

In this blog, Alex Quigley explores the growing evidence that many pupils, particularly older students and those from more vulnerable groups, experience a weak sense of belonging at school, while also highlighting the challenges of defining and measuring belonging: The challenge of belonging 

This blog, written by The Mindfulness in Schools Project, explores how belonging is built through positive, lasting relationships, particularly strong student–teacher relationships, inclusion and meaningful participation: Belonging: How do we nurture it? 

This Schools Week article challenges the idea that wellbeing and academic attainment are competing priorities, arguing that stronger pupil wellbeing and belonging can support engagement, attendance and academic outcomes: Pupil wellbeing and academic attainment? You can have both

This Schools Week article argues that belonging is not created through one-off initiatives, rewards or behaviour systems, but through a sustained culture of relational inclusion, where pupils feel genuinely seen, heard, known and accepted: Forget the buzzword bingo, here’s how schools can get belonging right 

This SEND Network article highlights that school belonging is built through intentional, sustained relationships, peer connection and inclusive whole-school practices, rather than quick-fix interventions. It offers practical approaches, including the Establish–Maintain–Restore framework, to help pupils feel valued, safe and connected: The Connection Factor: How Can Schools Build a Sense of Belonging? 

Case studies 

The DfE’s Pupil Wellbeing and Behaviour collection brings together a range of practical examples from schools on promoting wellbeing, positive behaviour and inclusion: Pupil Wellbeing and Behaviour 

The Research School Network provides a series of case studies around fostering belonging in primary schools from across the UK: 

 

The Connected Belonging provides a range of case studies to demonstrate how schools have applied their framework, using targeted approaches to strengthen pupil belonging: Connected Belonging: Case Studies 

Well Schools provides a series of case studies to showcase how schools are embedding physical activity, wellbeing and belonging into whole-school culture through inclusive PE, leadership opportunities, movement-based regulation and recognition of pupils’ strengths: Youth Sports Trust - Well Schools - Case studies 

 

This article has been published as part of the Rethinking Curriculum project, kindly funded by The Helen Hamlyn Trust.

 

 

 

 

Jane Fearnley OBE, CEO of Willow Tree Academy

Context

 Willow Tree Academy is a four-school primary academy trust based in Rotherham, South Yorkshire. Our schools serve communities experiencing significant disadvantage, with many of our children living in poverty. We offer a bespoke step-out social, emotional and mental health (SEMH) provision for children within our trust schools and beyond. The LEAF (Leading Endeavours for Aspirational Futures) Centre plays a key role in this work, offering tailored support for children with social and emotional needs rooted in trauma, adverse childhood experiences, and other complex life circumstances.

At Willow Tree Academy, we want every child to leave us as a confident, successful young person who is proud of who they are and ready to take their place in the world. Our schools focus on delivering ambitious learning, where nurturing personal development and building emotional resilience are fundamental to success. To achieve this, our behaviour and inclusion teams work closely with school staff to ensure every child feels safe, valued, and supported.

Staff development is a central pillar of our trust. We offer high-quality professional development, coaching, and leadership programmes for colleagues at every stage of their career. We invest in our people because we know that confident, well-supported staff make the greatest difference to children’s lives.

We believe that every child, regardless of background, deserves access to a rich, vibrant, skills- and knowledge-based curriculum, alongside consistently high-quality teaching every day.

Civic leadership and the trust-wide challenge

As part of the Rethinking Curriculum’s Fostering Creativity in the Classroom programme, we embarked on journey to reframe our understanding of creativity and its place within our trust. The facilitator training provided as part of the programme was fundamental to our own professional development as senior leaders. Through this training, and our subsequent facilitation of the programme, we deepened our knowledge and understanding of what it means to develop and sustain a creative curriculum.

From this work, we have begun to use the OECD design criteria (Vincent-Lancrin et al., 2019) to support practitioners across our trust in fostering creativity within their classroom practice. This involved bringing together teachers and leaders from thirteen schools, spanning four multi-academy trusts. The diverse group of leaders and teachers represented a wide range of expertise, skills, experiences and perspectives. Participants' roles ranged from early career teachers to headteachers and trust leaders, encompassing every stage of educational leadership. We were also keen to include our international partner school, Tanghu Elementary School Chengdu, China. Despite being 5000 miles apart, our partnership revealed that we face similar challenges, leading us to a joint enquiry question:

How can creativity be fostered within the classroom?

What quickly became apparent was the consistent and genuine thread that united this wonderfully diverse group of professionals—a shared commitment in bringing something different to their teaching and curriculum design, with the aim of equipping pupils with the knowledge, skills and dispositions needed to thrive in an ever-changing world.

Starting points

When reviewing curriculum design across our schools, we noticed a common trend: the pressure of high-stakes assessment often caused teachers to lean into safe, highly scaffolded, and convergent lesson designs. Although we are proud of our creative, cross-curricular approach, we found that teachers often struggled to identify the connections necessary to design sequences of meaningful and coherent lessons that developed and challenged pupils’ critical and creative thinking skills. As a result, coaching and mentoring from senior leaders was often required. At a leadership level, this challenge sometimes resulted in a ‘do it for them’ approach, which inadvertently limited opportunities to build teacher confidence and ownership. We recognised the need to move towards a more empowering model by encouraging practitioners to ask the question:

How can I engage my pupils in authentic learning experiences that enable progress in both content knowledge and skill development, while also nurturing imagination and innovation?

When embarking on the facilitator training, we brought considerable collective experience and expertise in curriculum design, but also lots of unanswered questions and frustrations. As we began our work together, several key challenges emerged:

  • Inconsistent definitions: The meaning of creativity varied considerably among our primary practitioners and leaders, resulting in differing interpretations, expectations, and approaches.
  • Lack of scalable assessment: Without an objective way to track progress in creative thinking, it was difficult to measure the impact of our curriculum intent, nor to ‘know’ the impact of our curriculum on pupils' (and staff’s) ability to think creatively.
  • Teacher cognitive load: We needed a framework that enhanced and strengthened existing subject disciplines, rather than introducing an additional layer of complexity or administrative burden for teachers.

 

These challenges highlighted the need for a shared framework through which creativity could be understood, developed and embedded across our schools. We were seeking an approach that was both theoretically grounded and practically applicable — one that would enable us to articulate our curriculum intentions more clearly and support pupils and staff in developing their creative thinking in meaningful and measurable ways.

Embedding the OECD framework

To ensure pedagogical rigour, we anchored our strategy in the OECD Framework for Creative and Critical Thinking (Figure 1). This rubric splits creativity into four distinct, teachable habits of mind. From a trust perspective, we mapped these dimensions across all key stages to create a continuum of growth:

Figure 1: Curriculum rubric informed by the OECD Framework for Creative and Critical Thinking (Vincent-Lancrin et al., 2019), used to guide curriculum development across the trust.

OECD dimensionTrust-wide curriculum translationFocus
InquiringChallenging assumptions & boundaries.Exploring ‘What if?’ questions by challenging assumptions, identifying problems, and generating purposeful lines of enquiry
ImaginingGenerating diverse, original ideas.Generating and combining ideas through divergent thinking, visualisation, and creative possibility-building
DoingTesting ideas and embracing risk.Applying ideas through experimentation, prototyping and refinement in real or practical contexts
ReflectingEvaluating outcomes and iterating.Using critical reflection, feedback and metacognitive thinking to refine ideas and improve outcomes
ConnectingLinking ideas across subjects and contextsMaking interdisciplinary connections and transferring learning between domains to deepen understanding and creativity

Implementation strategy: The Willow Tree Academy Trust rollout

Scaling this work across multiple schools required a deliberate, phased implementation strategy grounded in sustained professional development and cross-Trust collaboration. This included:

  • Establishing trust-wide professional learning communities: We established cross-trust subject networks that enabled genuine co-construction of curriculum and practice across primary settings. Teachers and leaders from different phases and schools worked together to design units of work that explicitly developed the OECD dimensions of Inquiring and Imagining. These networks created space for shared enquiry, professional dialogue and the development of a consistent language for creativity across the Trust.
  • Embedding formative rubrics: A clear distinction was made from the outset between formative and summative assessment. The OECD-aligned rubrics (Vincent-Lancrin et al., 2019) were introduced as diagnostic tools to support learning, rather than as mechanisms for accountability. In subjects such as mathematics, pupils were recognised not only for arriving at correct answers, but also for demonstrating originality of method, flexibility of thinking and iterative problem-solving. This shift supported a greater focus on the learning process as well as outcomes.
  • Cross-school moderation and shared understanding of progression: Teachers from across the trust engaged in regular moderation sessions focused on pupil work and learning outcomes. This process was critical in developing a shared understanding of progression in creative thinking. Through discussion of evidence from subjects such as writing, science and design technology, colleagues built consensus around what high-quality creativity looked like in practice. This strengthened professional confidence in identifying and valuing attributes such as reflection, ideation and originality.

 

Collectively, these approaches fostered a culture of collaboration, shared ownership and professional trust across our trust. Creativity was no longer positioned as an additional initiative; but increasingly understood as an integral component of high-quality teaching, curriculum design and assessment.

What’s different? What’s changed?

The implementation of learnings from the Rethinking Curriculum’s Fostering Creativity in the Classroom programme has led to significant and multifaceted changes across our school communities, affecting pupils, staff, and parents. The impact has been evident not only in classroom practice and curriculum design, but also in the wider professional culture and shared understanding of creativity across our trust.

Transformation of teaching and staff culture

  • Teacher flourishing and retention: The programme contributed to the development of a thriving and positive professional culture, fostering joy in teaching and strengthening staff commitment to their roles. Teachers reported a greater sense of autonomy and trust, enabling them to respond creatively and effectively to pupils’ needs.
  • Teachers as lifelong learners: Staff described renewed enthusiasm for their own learning and professional curiosity, frequently exploring new ideas and sharing these with pupils. In doing so, they modelled the dispositions associated with lifelong learning.
  • Professional growth: The work reinforced the importance of teachers’ own creative development as a foundation for nurturing creativity in pupils.

 

Curriculum and environmental changes

  • Innovative curriculum design: Colleagues were given opportunities to reflect upon, plan, and redesign elements of their curriculum, placing skill development at the heart of learning and establishing authentic cross-curricular connections that supported innovation and deeper understanding. This represented a shift away from ‘doing what has always been done’ towards an approach characterised by experimentation, reflection, and adaptation. It also created opportunities to assess creativity through the use of rubrics, enabling teachers and pupils to assess progress, reflect on learning, and understand the impact of creative approaches.
  • Supportive learning environments: Learning spaces were reimagined as environments in which pupils felt safe to take risks, engage their senses, and celebrate each stage of the creative process. These environments fostered confidence, curiosity, and a willingness to experiment, helping to establish a culture in which creativity could flourish.

 

CPD and cultural change

  • Professional development: We implemented structured twilight training sessions designed to equip teachers and school leaders with practical tools to support curriculum innovation. Staff engaged in professional learning that explored the definition of creativity, broke down barriers to being creative practitioners, and introduced global frameworks like the OECD Framework for Creative and Critical Thinking (Vincent-Lancrin et al., 2019) and the Five Creative Habits of Mind (Lucas et al., 2013).
  • Collaborative planning culture: The training strengthened a culture of collaboration, where colleagues shared their own most creative lesson plans and collectively audited upcoming units of work. Teachers critically evaluated existing plans, working together to increase the density of creative components, shifting lesson planning from an isolated task to a shared, reflective exercise.
  • Systemic framework integration: A significant cultural shift was achieved by establishing a common pedagogical language across the trust using the CIPID framework (Collaborative, Inquisitive, Persistent, Imaginative, Disciplined) (Lucas et al., 2013). Rather than treating creativity as an abstract concept, the trust integrated structured next steps into standard operational workflows, encouraging teachers to utilise the framework in lesson planning and following up with reflective feedback sessions.

 

Impact on pupil outcomes

To evidence impact, pupil progress was tracked on a termly basis using matrices adapted from the OECD rubrics (Vincent-Lancrin et al., 2019). Cross-school moderation used a portfolio sampling method to audit pupil outcomes against the CIPID criteria. This data was contextualised through structured pupil voice interviews— with a particular focus on disadvantaged learners—and cross-referenced with internal academic and behaviour data.

  • Enhanced academic performance: Participation in creative approaches to learning— including learning beyond the classroom, oracy, drama, music, performance, and other creative tools and techniques—supported pupils’ development in core subjects by strengthening memory, motivation, and problem-solving skills. This was reflected in improved resilience, attainment outcomes, and classroom behaviour.
  • Improved wellbeing and confidence: Pupils demonstrated increased confidence, a stronger belief in their own abilities, and higher self-esteem. Many described creative approaches as providing greater ownership of their learning. Teacher observations also indicated increased levels of pupil confidence, resilience, and engagement.
  • Social equity: A creative focus provided opportunities for pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds to access experiences that might otherwise have been unavailable to them. In this way, creative approaches helped to broaden participation and enrich pupils’ cultural and educational experiences.

 

Teacher feedback

Leading staff CPD and driving whole-school monitoring for the Rethinking Curriculum programme has been a brilliant step in my own professional growth. In Year 6, where there is a large amount of pressure for assessments and data, this training has helped me move away from overly scaffolded lessons. Instead, I’ve focused on using the OECD rubrics as a supportive, everyday tool to celebrate how children solve problems and think outside the box, rather than just chasing the correct answer. Guiding other teachers through this process through tailored staff meetings and observing this creative language develop across our classrooms has really built my confidence as a leader.

ECT feedback

Using my understanding of what Rethinking Curriculum has delivered has been a great toolkit to have for my own professional practice. As an ECT, it has been a great support tool to have whilst considering my own planning and looking at alternative ways for the children to think about their learning. In Y3, where learning is often heavily modelled and scaffolded, it has been amazing to take a step back and allow the children to problem solve through their own problem-solving techniques. Using a case study provided by the course, I was able to see the children’s thoughts and problem solving through a range of discussions. It was fantastic to watch them think outside of the box within their learning and outcomes.

Leader feedback: Headteacher

Being part of the Fostering Creativity programme has allowed me to reflect on the creativity within our current teaching strategies and curriculum and has supported me to identify opportunities to support our children in being creative and having ownership of their learning. The dialogue and collaboration between colleagues, guided by the facilitators, has been invaluable and provoked my thinking in areas of our curriculum that I wouldn't have considered in that way before.

Leadership recommendations

For trust and school leaders seeking to develop their curriculum through this lens, our experience highlights four key principles:

  • Meaningful change takes time and must be authentically led by school leaders. Practitioners require the space and permission to explore open-ended approaches, test new ideas, and refine their practice through trial and reflection. While early experimentation may feel uncertain, this process is essential in balancing secure knowledge acquisition with creative exploration.
  • The rubrics are most powerful when used to support learning rather than judge it. By embedding creative frameworks strictly within formative assessment and self-reflection, leaders can preserve the conditions necessary for curiosity, risk-taking, and honest professional dialogue. When creativity becomes a high-stakes metric, the willingness to experiment quickly diminishes.
  • Creativity is not uniform; it manifests differently across disciplines. Practitioners should be trusted to interpret and apply the framework in ways that honour the unique nature of each subject, while remaining firmly aligned with the overarching trust vision.
  • The assessment of creativity requires careful consideration. To support this, the OECD assessment rubrics and creative frameworks (Vincent-Lancrin et al., 2019) should be integrated into existing teaching models as formative tools. Leaders must clearly establish when, where and how it is appropriate to evaluate creative habits, ensuring this process runs alongside—yet remains distinct from—the assessment of core subject-disciplinary and substantive knowledge.

 

References

Lucas B, G Claxton and E Spencer (2013) Progression in Student Creativity in School: First Steps Towards New Forms of Formative Assessments, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 86, OECD Publishing. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2013/01/progression-in-student-creativity-in-school_g17a2218/5k4dp59msdwk-en.pdf (accessed on 17 July 2026)

Vincent-Lancrin S, González-Sancho C, Bouckaert M, de Luca F, Fernández-Barrera M, Jacotin G, Urgel J and Vidal Q (2019) Fostering Students’ Creativity and Critical Thinking: What It Means in School. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2019/10/fostering-students-creativity-and-critical-thinking_3ffa73e4/62212c37-en.pdf (accessed on 15 July 2026

This article has been published as part of the Rethinking Curriculum project, kindly funded by The Helen Hamlyn Trust.

 

 

 

 

Paul Thomas, Headteacher, Parkwood Primary School

Raquel Tola-Rego, Specialist Teacher, Parkwood Primary School

Abstract

 Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) provides a strong theoretical foundation, demonstrating that language acquisition is most effective when embedded within meaningful subject content, enabling pupils to develop both linguistic and conceptual understanding simultaneously (Coyle et al., 2010). This is reinforced by research emerging from Hackney, which highlights how CLIL can address key challenges in primary language learning by maximising exposure without increasing curriculum time, supporting non-specialist teachers, and aligning with how primary-aged pupils learn through immersive and contextualised experiences. The emphasis on oracy is further informed by evidence from the Education Endowment Foundation (EEF), which suggests that structured oral language approaches have a significant impact on learning outcomes, particularly for multilingual pupils. In addition, research into creativity in the curriculum emphasises that connecting learning across subjects can enhance pupil engagement and support higher-order thinking (Craft, 2005). The integration of art and design technology also draws on theories of embodied cognition, which suggest that learning is strengthened when linked to physical activity and sensory experience (Reggin et al., 2023). Taken together, this body of research supports a curriculum model in which language, creativity and cognition are meaningfully integrated.

Introduction

Parkwood Primary School, located in Hackney, serves a diverse and multilingual community, where inclusion, creativity and intercultural understanding are central to our curriculum vision. While both Spanish and the foundation subjects—particularly art and design technology (DT)—were valued within the school, they had historically been delivered as discrete subjects. This limited opportunities for pupils to apply language meaningfully or to experience creativity as a connected and purposeful process.

The need for change emerged from both contextual and research-informed considerations. Research on language acquisition suggests that pupils learn most effectively when exposed to meaningful input in low-anxiety environments, where language is used for authentic purposes rather than studied in isolation (Krashen, 1982). This is reinforced by work on Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL), which demonstrates that integrating subject content and language learning enables pupils to develop both conceptual understanding and linguistic competence simultaneously (Coyle et al., 2010).

Within the English primary context, these challenges are well documented. Research from Hackney highlights that CLIL approaches can address limitations in curriculum time, teacher subject knowledge and curriculum coherence by maximising language exposure without increasing curriculum demands (Labeau and Tola Rego, 2022). Such approaches also align with how primary pupils learn—through immersion, purposeful use and implicit acquisition (Labeau and Tola Rego, 2022).

At the same time, research into creativity and interdisciplinary learning emphasises the importance of connected curricula in enhancing engagement, retention and higher-order thinking (Craft, 2005). For our setting—with a high proportion of pupils learning English as an additional language—approaches that prioritise oracy, contextualised language and multimodal learning are particularly important.

In response, we developed an integrated curriculum model using CLIL principles, embedding Spanish within art and DT, linked to wider thematic curriculum work.

Curriculum and pedagogical approach

The intervention involved embedding Spanish within art and DT units across the school through carefully designed thematic topics. This approach was implemented over time, beginning with pilot units and evolving into broader curriculum integration.

The design was informed by the CLIL 4Cs framework—Content, Communication, Cognition and Culture (Coyle et al., 2010; Zarobe., 2025). This ensured that learning was not integrated superficially, but structured to promote depth across multiple domains:

  • Content: Development of artistic and design knowledge and skills
  • Communication: Acquisition and application of Spanish vocabulary and structures
  • Cognition: Opportunities for analysis, problem-solving and evaluation
  • Culture: Engagement with artists, traditions and contexts from the Spanish-speaking world

 

Language was explicitly positioned as a medium for learning, rather than an isolated subject. This aligns with CLIL research, which highlights that meaningful exposure within subject contexts promotes both motivation and language acquisition (Coyle et al., 2010; Labeau and Tola Rego, 2022).

Lessons were designed with dual objectives. For example, pupils might explore colour and texture in art while describing their work using Spanish adjectives, or follow instructions in DT using key Spanish phrases.

Key pedagogical strategies included:

  • Structured language scaffolding, including modelling and sentence frames
  • Oracy-rich learning environments, where pupils regularly rehearse spoken language
  • Multisensory, practical learning, linking language to physical experience
  • Cultural authenticity, embedding language within meaningful contexts

 

This emphasis on oracy is supported by research from the Education Endowment Foundation (EEF), which highlights that oral language approaches can have a positive impact on pupils’ learning—particularly in primary settings and for disadvantaged learners—when talk is explicitly structured and used to support thinking (EEF, 2026).

The practical and creative nature of art and DT also aligns with theories of embodied cognition, which suggest that learning is strengthened when it is linked to physical activity and sensory experience, supporting deeper understanding and retention of knowledge (Reggin et al., 2023).

Implementation was evaluated through pupil voice, work scrutiny, lesson observation and informal assessment of language use. As identified in broader research, maintaining teacher confidence and ensuring curriculum coherence remained key considerations in sustaining the approach.

Findings and implications

The introduction of this CLIL-informed approach has led to several emerging benefits.

Successes

A key outcome has been increased pupil engagement. Learning Spanish through creative, purposeful activity appears to reduce anxiety and increase willingness to participate, reflecting Krashen’s (1982) emphasis on the importance of low-stress, meaningful language environments.

There is also evidence of improved language retention and application. Pupils are better able to recall vocabulary when it is embedded in practical, hands-on activities. This supports theories of embodied and situated learning, where cognition is strengthened through real-world experience and interaction (Reggin et al., 2023).

The approach has contributed to the development of oracy, with pupils demonstrating greater confidence in speaking Spanish. Regular opportunities for structured talk align with evidence that oral language supports both understanding and wider attainment (EEF, 2024).

In addition, there has been a positive impact on intercultural understanding, with pupils engaging meaningfully with artists, cultural traditions and global perspectives.

The approach has also supported inclusion, particularly for pupils with SEND and those learning English as an additional language, through the use of visual, practical and language-rich teaching strategies.

Challenges and limitations

Despite these strengths, several challenges remain.

Teacher confidence in language delivery is one such challenge, reflecting wider national challenges in primary languages provision (Labeau and Tola Rego, 2022). Addressing this will require ongoing professional development, including coaching and modelling with our language specialists, as well as more direct language-specific training

Ensuring curriculum coherence and progression in both subject knowledge and language is complex and requires careful mapping. There is a risk of superficial integration if planning is not sufficiently rigorous.

Assessment also remains an area for development, particularly in capturing both subject and language outcomes within integrated lessons. Our next steps will focus on evaluating the impact of current assessment procedures and developing more robust and clearly defined outcome measures, utilising our existing assessment tracking tool to give greater clarity on each aspect of learning.

Future evaluation

While initial findings are promising, further evaluation will focus on:

  • Continuing to track progression in Spanish across year groups
  • Developing clearer assessment frameworks
  • Exploring the long-term impact on pupils’ confidence and attainment, specifically the development of CLIL in EYFS to better understand progress of pupils learning languages from the age of three.

Recommendations

Based on our experience, several recommendations emerge for schools wishing to adopt a similar approach:

  • Begin with pilot projects to refine practice and build confidence.
  • Use a clear framework, such as the CLIL 4Cs, to guide planning.
  • Invest in high-quality professional development for staff.
  • Prioritise oracy and purposeful language use across the curriculum.
  • Ensure cultural authenticity in curriculum design.
  • Plan carefully for progression across subjects and language learning.
  • Adopt an iterative, reflective approach to curriculum development.

Conclusion

At Parkwood Primary School, integrating Spanish through art and DT using a CLIL approach has helped to strengthen both creative learning and language acquisition. By embedding language within meaningful, engaging contexts, pupils develop confidence, deepen understanding and make connections across the curriculum.

Importantly, this approach is grounded not only in school-level innovation but also in a strong evidence base, including research on CLIL, oracy, creativity and embodied learning, as well as local work in Hackney demonstrating the effectiveness of immersive, content-based language models.

As schools continue to rethink curriculum design, this case study suggests that carefully planned interdisciplinary approaches can enhance engagement, support inclusion and enable language learning to be both meaningful and memorable.

References

Coyle D, Hood P and Marsh D (2010) CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Craft A (2005) Creativity in Schools: Tensions and Dilemmas. London: Routledge.

Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) (2024) What does the evidence base tell us about effective oral language practice? Available at: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/news/what-does-the-evidence-base-tell-us-about-effective-oral-language-practice (accessed 9 June 2026).

Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) (2026) Oral language interventions. Available at: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/teaching-learning-toolkit/oral-language-interventions (accessed 9 June 2026).

Labeau E and Tola Rego R (2022) CLIL to make primary pupils click for languages: Lessons from Hackney. In: McManus K and Schmid MS (eds) How special are early birds? Foreign language teaching and learning. Berlin: Language Science Press, pp.119–144. Available at: https://publications.aston.ac.uk/id/eprint/45170/1/Ch_6_E_Labeau_and_R_Tola_Rego_CLIL_Lessons_from_Hackney.pdf (accessed 9 June 2026).

Reggin LD, Gómez Franco LE, Horchak O et al. (2023) ‘Situated and embodied language acquisition’, Journal of Cognition 6(1): 63.

Ruiz de Zarobe Y (2025) Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

This article has been published as part of the Rethinking Curriculum project, kindly funded by The Helen Hamlyn Trust.

 

 

 

 

Dr Jeremy Hannay, Executive Principal, Southall Waterside Federation

Introduction

More than a decade ago, visitors to Three Bridges Primary School were greeted by a phrase that attracted equal measures of curiosity, enthusiasm and criticism:

‘The Happiest School on Earth’

Some people smiled. Others rolled their eyes. In a system increasingly dominated by accountability, data and school improvement rhetoric, happiness felt like an unusual aspiration. Yet behind the slogan sat a serious question:

What if wellbeing wasn't something schools did, but something schools produced?

Like many schools, we had explored wellbeing initiatives, dedicated wellbeing weeks and curriculum resources. Many were valuable. Over time, however, we became increasingly convinced that wellbeing was being treated as something additional, rather than something that naturally emerged from the way a school functioned. That question gradually reshaped our thinking.

Today, Three Bridges Primary School serves about 500 children in Southall, one of the most diverse communities in the country. While academic excellence remains central to our work, we no longer see wellbeing as something that sits alongside the curriculum. Instead, we believe wellbeing is a consequence of curriculum, culture and leadership working together. More specifically, we have come to believe that belonging precedes wellbeing. This case study outlines how that idea has shaped our curriculum over the past decade and what we have learned along the way.

Why belonging?

Our thinking has been influenced by several complementary strands of research. Self-Determination Theory argues that human flourishing depends upon autonomy, competence and relatedness (Deci and Ryan, 2000). Noddings (2005) places relationships at the heart of education, while Maslow's hierarchy (1943) positions belonging as a fundamental human need. Hargreaves and Fullan (2012) similarly argue that sustainable improvement depends upon professional capital built through trust and collaboration.

My own doctoral research explored the relationship between Lesson Study, school climate and teacher self-efficacy (Hannay, 2021). One finding became increasingly difficult to ignore: teachers learned best when they felt psychologically safe, trusted and connected to one another.

Together, these ideas suggested something remarkably simple: people flourish when they feel known, valued and able to contribute. Rather than asking how to improve wellbeing, we began asking what kind of school naturally creates those conditions.

Our curriculum approach

Several years ago, we undertook a complete review of our school's ethos. At around the same time, Three Bridges became one of the founding Well Schools. Rather than giving us a new programme to implement, the work helped us articulate what we were already beginning to understand: that wellbeing could not be separated from curriculum, leadership, relationships or community. As both our school and the Well Schools movement evolved, they shaped one another. The framework gave us a language for conversations we were already having, while continually challenging us to examine whether children, families and staff genuinely experienced belonging in the everyday life of the school. The result continues to underpin every aspect of our curriculum:

  • A developing, critical mind
  • Eyes wide open, hands uutstretched
  • A full, strong and healthy heart

 

Importantly, these are not wellbeing statements. They are curriculum statements. They describe the kind of people we hope children become as a consequence of learning with us. Knowledge remains essential, but we believe education should also develop curiosity, compassion, courage, critical thinking and a sense of responsibility towards others. Belonging therefore became less about helping children feel included and more about enabling them to become active contributors within their communities.

Across the curriculum, children are expected not only to learn but to lead, perform, present, organise, mentor and serve. They contribute through assemblies, pupil leadership, performances, charitable projects, classroom dialogue and collaborative learning. Representation matters, but contribution matters equally. Children begin to experience belonging when they recognise that they are helping shape the community, rather than simply participating within it.

Our work with adults has increasingly shaped our thinking about children. Over the past decade, professional learning at Three Bridges has moved away from performance management and towards collaborative inquiry. Through Lesson Study, lines of enquiry and, more recently, staff passion projects, we have sought to create the same conditions for adults that we hope children experience every day: professional trust, intellectual curiosity, collaboration, agency and meaningful contribution. Rather than asking teachers simply to implement change, we have invited them to investigate questions that matter to them, pursue areas of professional passion and contribute to the learning of the wider organisation. As this culture has developed, one conviction has become increasingly clear: the conditions we want children to experience cannot simply be described in our classrooms; they must first be lived in our staffrooms.

This thinking is now beginning to shape the next phase of our curriculum through the development of Rubber Duck Day, inspired by our recent learning alongside Canadian educators Leslie Mott and Christopher Rowsome.

I first met Leslie and Chris during a learning visit to Canada in 2024. Within five minutes of stepping into their classrooms, I could see the next stage of our own journey.

For many years, we had been intentionally creating the conditions for teachers to lead their own professional learning: asking big questions, immersing themselves in areas of curiosity, pursuing passion projects, and learning alongside one another. We believed that if we trusted teachers as learners, that learning would inevitably find its way into the classroom and enrich children's experiences.

What I saw in Leslie and Chris's school was not a programme to replicate or a formula to follow. Rather, it was a glimpse of what those same principles could become when fully realised in the day-to-day experiences of children. Their work gave shape to ideas we had long held and, perhaps most importantly, gave us permission to continue pursuing a path that felt both ambitious and, until then, largely unexplored.

Rather than viewing curriculum primarily as something delivered by teachers, we are interested in how it can be co-constructed by children themselves. The next stage of our journey is the introduction of Rubber Duck Day, where the children step into rich, self-directed learning centred around authentic curricular challenges, working collaboratively to question, investigate and build understanding together. Alongside this, they undertake acts of service that contribute to the wider school community, recognising that belonging is strengthened not simply by feeling included, but by making a meaningful contribution to others. We have come to believe that flourishing happens when children experience all three together: mastering important knowledge, contributing to something beyond themselves and exercising genuine agency over aspects of their learning.

Our ambition is that these experiences develop critical minds through an authentic curriculum, open hands through service to others, and full, strong hearts through collaboration, resilience and shared endeavour. Rather than seeing these as separate ambitions, we see them as different expressions of the same curriculum. We are still learning ourselves, but we see Rubber Duck Day not as a standalone event, but as a glimpse of the curriculum we are working towards — one that reflects, for children, the same culture of inquiry, trust and shared learning that has been developing among adults for many years.

Challenges along the way

Perhaps the greatest challenge was resisting the temptation to solve wellbeing through new initiatives. Educational systems often encourage schools to respond by purchasing programmes, creating policies or appointing leads. While these approaches can have value, we found that belonging is built through thousands of ordinary interactions rather than individual interventions. How are people greeted? How are mistakes handled? How are meetings conducted? How is feedback given? How are difficult conversations managed? These seemingly ordinary moments communicate far more powerfully than any wellbeing lesson ever could.

A second challenge involved balancing support and accountability. Belonging is sometimes misunderstood as lowering expectations or avoiding difficult conversations. Our experience has been the opposite. Children and adults flourish when expectations are high, relationships are strong and boundaries are clear. The challenge for leaders is ensuring that accountability is experienced through trust rather than fear, and challenge through care rather than control.

Finally, we learned the importance of discernment. Not every concern requires a new initiative. Not every problem needs a policy. Often, the most significant leadership decision is deciding what not to introduce. Rather than adding wellbeing to an already crowded improvement plan, we began viewing every existing priority through the lens of belonging.

Findings and implications

Belonging is difficult to measure directly, yet its influence can be seen throughout the life of the school. Over the past decade, we have experienced consistently strong recruitment and staff retention, sustained academic outcomes and positive inspection judgements. More importantly, we have developed a professional culture in which teachers openly share practice, admit uncertainty and learn together. Our evaluation has drawn on staff retention, recruitment, inspection outcomes, pupil and parent voice, and our own reflections on the evolution of professional culture.

Families frequently tell us that the school simply feels different. Former pupils return describing Three Bridges as a place where they felt known and valued. Teachers choose to build long-term careers within the school because they experience professional trust alongside professional challenge. One unexpected finding is that wellbeing has become less visible over time. Paradoxically, this feels like success.

When wellbeing is sufficiently embedded within culture, it no longer requires constant attention. It becomes evident in how meetings are run, how children are spoken to, how parents are welcomed and how adults work together. Wellbeing ceases to be an initiative because it has become part of everyday life.

Recommendations for school leaders

For schools wishing to strengthen belonging across the curriculum, five principles have guided our work.

  • Treat belonging as a leadership strategy rather than a wellbeing initiative.
  • Create for adults the same conditions you want children to experience.
  • Focus on everyday interactions rather than isolated programmes.
  • Hold support and challenge together through relationships built on trust.
  • Be patient. Culture develops over years, not terms.

 

Ultimately, we have learned that belonging is not another priority to balance alongside curriculum. It is the lens through which curriculum is designed, leadership is exercised and communities are built. Looking back, I am not sure that The Happiest School on Earth was ever really about happiness. It was about creating a school where people feel that they matter. When children and adults experience genuine belonging, wellbeing is no longer something we need to teach. Perhaps that has been our greatest lesson: schools do not create belonging by talking about it. They create it through the experiences they design every day—for children and for adults alike.

References

Deci EL and Ryan RM (2000) The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behaviour. Psychological Inquiry 11(4): 227–268.

Hannay J (2021) Lessons from Lesson Study: Lesson Study, School Climate and Teacher Self-Efficacy. PhD thesis, University of Exeter.

Hargreaves A and Fullan M (2012) Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School. London: Routledge.

Maslow AH (1943) A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review 50(4): 370–396.

Noddings N (2005) The Challenge to Care in Schools: An Alternative Approach to Education. 2nd edn. New York: Teachers College Press.

 

 

 

 

This article has been published as part of the Rethinking Curriculum project, kindly funded by The Helen Hamlyn Trust.

 

 

 

 

Debi Keyte-Hartland, Pedagogical Consultant, Artist-Educator and Researcher

Debi has worked with teachers and senior leaders at Woodlands Primary School and Nursery for over ten years, fostering reflective practice through pedagogical coaching.

Introduction

Woodlands Primary School and Nursery is in Madeley, Telford & Wrekin, and part of the Four Hills Education Trust. The school serves a diverse community shaped by socio-economic challenge, including higher-than-average levels of disadvantage, school-readiness gaps, and a significant proportion of pupils with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND).

At Woodlands, the curriculum is shaped by children’s needs, motivations and enquiries, alongside disciplinary knowledge. In the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS), this is realised through enquiry-based project work influenced by the Reggio Emilia approach (Project Zero and Reggio Children, 2001), in which the arts are understood as languages of learning. Children’s questions and ideas help shape the curriculum, while educators respond through observation, documentation and shared enquiry.

An enquiry-based pedagogical approach

Following an educational study visit to the pre-schools of Reggio Emilia, Italy, the then Head of Early Years at Woodlands (who became Headteacher, now retired) was struck by the depth of children’s enquiry and the central role of the arts in fostering creative thinking. Seeking to develop an enquiry-based, arts-rich curriculum in her own context, she approached me because of my expertise in the Reggio Emilia approach and my research into creative pedagogies. What began as monthly professional conversations evolved into sustained pedagogical coaching across the early years educator team. Together, we explored ways of rethinking teaching, learning, and curriculum through children's expressive, creative, and conceptual enquiries, supporting educators to develop more reflective, responsive, and research-informed pedagogical practices.

Over time, Woodlands has embedded an enquiry-based approach to learning, positioning young children as active participants in playful, meaningful learning experiences. Children ask questions such as, ‘How do crabs hear underwater?’, identify and solve problems such as how to work together to build a strong bridge, and develop working theories about the world through their interests, enquiries and identities (Hedges, 2022). These ideas are developed through what Rinaldi (2021) describes as a pedagogy of listening—an intentional and responsive approach in which educators attend closely to what children say, do and represent, and use this to shape subsequent teaching. Observation, documentation and analysis therefore help educators assess learning, interpret children’s thinking, and decide what to offer next.

Pedagogical documentation—children’s artefacts, drawings, dialogue, photographs, and film clips—makes children’s thinking visible. At Woodlands, educators examine children’s drawings, talk, constructions, and use of clay and digital media as evidence of how knowledge and understanding are built and how ideas are revisited over time. In this way, materials and media are treated not only as resources for expression, but also as pedagogical mediators that support conceptual understanding, language and communication, as well as collaborative skills developed through shared enquiry.

Rationale

By centring a creative curriculum and an arts-rich, responsive pedagogy rooted in children’s enquiries, educators at Woodlands position children as imaginative and capable thinkers. The curriculum is co-constructed with children, foregrounding their agency and participation while expanding educators’ creative pedagogies (Chesworth, 2022). This means that children’s ideas, questions and expressive acts are treated not as peripheral to learning, but as significant contributions to curriculum-making and knowledge construction.

Participation in the arts and aesthetic experience can nurture individual growth and collective wellbeing, enabling children and adults to thrive as a community (Magsamen and Ross, 2023). Using expressive arts within enquiry-based learning can also support children’s flourishing—their positive emotions, engagement, relationships, meaning-making and accomplishment (Seligman, 2011) —by recognising their unique strengths and identities, particularly during periods of transition, such as the move to Key Stage 1 (Foster, Gunning and Keyte-Hartland, 2025). This approach values children’s imagination, originality and ideas over reproducing adult models or simply following instructions, creating the conditions in which children can think critically, represent ideas through multiple modes, and communicate with increasing ease and confidence.

Here, the arts are understood as languages that communicate through more than words. Through material and aesthetic experiences, children express ideas, feelings and theories with increasing complexity. These languages can build reciprocity, empathy and wellbeing within the learning community (Keyte-Hartland and Lowings, 2024) and help children construct knowledge about the world (Sellers, 2013). In this sense, the expressive arts are not separate from everyday learning; they mediate it by shaping how children explore, represent and make sense of their experiences.

Implementation

We began this work by dedicating staff meeting times and an INSET day to thinking about the processes and characteristics of enquiry we wanted to develop, alongside identifying the possible themes of enquiry that could emerge with the children. Rather than seeing professional development as a one-off event, we considered professional learning as rooted in ongoing reflection on practice. This reflected the approach of educators in Reggio Emilia who inspired senior leaders to develop creative enquiry practices that reframed professional learning as research into how children learn—and how educators teach—as the children themselves researched their world (Fawcett and Hay, 2008).

Educators began to develop their long-term enquiry work in pairs, committing to a self-selected area of interest, such as block play. Together, they developed extended enquiries with mixed Nursery and Reception groups. These enquiry-based projects explored themes including relationships between trees in the school grounds, the origins of dreams, and children’s graphicacy and its relationship to writing. Rather than viewing learning has occurring through isolated lessons or one-off activities linked to a topic, learning was understood as being shaped over time. This required making explicit connections to children’s experiences and enabling pedagogical processes such as revisiting children’s ideas to support the development of increasingly complex thinking over time; developing mastery through different modalities and materials, such as drawing and working with clay; and ensuring children’s agency in co-constructing the next steps with educators and in response to their ideas.

Educators brought pedagogical documentation to coaching sessions, where they collaboratively analysed the impact of their teaching, the curation of materials and the learning emerging from children's experiences. Together, they reflected on children’s thinking, motivations and interests and, in response, co-designed next steps with colleagues and children. This approach exemplifies the dynamic and emergent nature of curriculum-making with children (Chesworth, 2022).

During the first year, practice shifted intentionally from pre-planned topics and adult-led activities towards a curriculum grounded in listening, participation, and children’s agency. Assessment became embedded within rigorous pedagogical enquiry, examining the relationship between educators’ intentions, enactment, and learning outcomes arising from children’s creative play, questions and material investigations.

Implementing this approach was not without challenges. Educators required protected time for sustained reflection and opportunities to develop critical dialogue about practice and pedagogy. This was enabled through pedagogical coaching that created the space and time to think deeply, question assumptions, and reflect critically.

A further challenge lay in balancing an emergent, lived curriculum, co-constructed with children, with the need to articulate and satisfy more prescribed curriculum requirements and accountability expectations, including those associated with Ofsted. This tension reflects what Aoki (2011) describes as the relationship between the lived curriculum and the curriculum-as-planned. At Woodlands, this was supported through careful timetabling and ensuring that enquiries were playful, arts-rich and embedded across the early years provision and wider teaching team. The expressive arts became understood as central to how children learn, construct knowledge and develop understanding, rather than being positioned as an additional activity or an isolated area of provision.

Findings and impact

The enquiry-based, arts-rich approach to curriculum at Woodlands supports children's learning in ways that are both cognitively challenging and relationally responsive. Grounded in careful observation, pedagogical analysis, and documentation of children's experiences, this approach deepens educators' understanding of how learning develops through relationships, dialogue, and shared enquiry. Teachers have observed that children are more engaged in learning and more willing and able to articulate, share, and develop their ideas with peers. Through sustained enquiry, children learn not only subject knowledge but also how to participate as confident, creative, and thoughtful members of a learning community.

The expressive arts act as pedagogical mediators within this process by providing multiple modes through which children can represent, communicate, and develop their thinking. Arts-rich pedagogies, such as collaborative drawing and responding to questions through shared making with blocks or loose parts, enable children to think together, explore possibilities, and construct understanding collectively. The impact of this approach therefore extends beyond what children know to encompass how they learn to engage with others, negotiate ideas, and develop the relational capacities needed within a nursery and reception learning community.

Senior leaders identify clear educational value in this enquiry-based, arts-rich approach. Children make strong progress within the EYFS, while also developing the confidence, responsibility and creative thinking needed beyond achieving a ‘good level of development’. Leaders evaluate the quality of provision through curriculum review, moderation of children’s work and learning walks. These processes enable leaders to assess the quality of teaching and learning, identify where further professional learning, support and resources are needed, and use this evidence to inform priorities within the school development plan.

Recommendations for schools

For schools wishing to develop a similar approach, the implications are both pedagogical and organisational. It requires more than adding arts experiences to the already full timetable; it requires curriculum-making with children (Chesworth, 2022), effective professional learning and rigorous assessment that recognises children as capable co-constructors of meaning.

  • Schools should invest in sustained professional learning that develops understanding of expressive arts pedagogy, pedagogical documentation and enquiry-based curriculum design. Effective professional development is ongoing, contextual and rooted in critical reflection on practice (Education Endowment Foundation, 2023).
  • This professional development should be strengthened by coaching, mentoring and regular reflective dialogue. This helps educators move towards more attuned and responsive practices while maintaining curricular depth through intentional teaching.
  • Schools should also reframe curriculum-making as a process undertaken with children and not just for them (Chesworth, 2022). This means planning learning contexts from children’s questions, theories and interests while connecting them to the educational programmes of the Early Years Foundation Stage statutory framework (Department for Education, 2025).
  • A further recommendation is to strengthen pedagogical documentation. Documentation makes learning visible and helps educators interpret not only what children have learned but also how they learn. It enables shared reflection with colleagues, children, and families while contributing to the development of professional knowledge and understanding (Project Zero and Reggio Children, 2001).
  • Schools should also protect environments, materials, and time for sustained exploration and enquiry. Open-ended resources and thoughtfully designed spaces that invite collaboration and experimentation support the characteristics of effective learning and the development of curiosity, persistence, and reciprocity (Department for Education, 2025).
  • Finally, this work requires leadership that aligns policy, provision and pedagogical values. Leaders need to protect time, foster trust and enable professional autonomy for curriculum-making with children, while valuing creativity and the arts as central to educational purpose.

Conclusion

This case study demonstrates that when expressive arts are placed at the centre of pedagogy and curriculum-making, they can mediate knowledge, participation and wellbeing in ways that expand understandings of what counts as learning in the early years. The challenge for schools is not simply to add more arts experiences, but to create the conditions in which children’s enquiries and creative acts can shape ambitious and relational forms of education.

References

Aoki T (2011) Curriculum in a new key: The collected works of Ted T. Aoki. London: Routledge.

Chesworth L (2022) Curriculum making with young children. London: Froebel Trust.

Department for Education (2025) Early years foundation stage statutory framework: for group and school-based providers. London: Department for Education.

Education Endowment Foundation (2023) Guide to Effective Professional Development in the Early Years. London: Education Endowment Foundation.

Fawcett M & Hay P (2008) Researching children researching the world: 5x5x5=creativity. Trentham Books.

Foster H, Gunning C and Keyte-Hartland D (2025) ‘Expressive arts and design matters’, in Lee, K. and Veale, V. (eds.) School Readiness Matters: Embedded and Threaded Transitions. TACTYC.

Hedges H (2022) Children’s interests, inquiries and identities: Curriculum, pedagogy, learning and outcomes in the early years. London: Routledge.

Keyte-Hartland D and Lowings L (2024) ‘Learning to live well together: Art and ecological research with young children’, in Arts in Nature with Children and Young People. London: Routledge.

Magsamen S and Ross I (2023) Your Brain on Art: How the Arts Transform Us. New York: Random House.

Seligman M E P (2011) Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.

Project Zero and Reggio Children (2001) Making Learning Visible: Children as Individual and Group Learners. Cambridge, MA: Project Zero, Harvard Graduate School of Education; Reggio Emilia: Reggio Children.

Rinaldi C (2021) In Dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, Researching and Learning. 2nd edn. London: Routledge.

Sellers M (2013) Young Children Becoming Curriculum: Deleuze, Te Whāriki and Curricular Understandings. London: Routledge.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We are currently looking for female PE teachers in UK secondary schools who teach boys in PE to take part in a one-hour online interview.

I would be very grateful if you could forward the attached participant information sheet and poster to any eligible teachers within your PE department.

The interview will take place online at a time convenient to the participant and will last approximately one hour.

Participants will receive a £20 gift voucher as a thank you for taking part.

If any teachers are interested in participating, they can register their interest using the link: Female PE Teachers’ Experience of Teaching Boys in PE

-

Thank you very much for your time and support. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch.

-

Researcher info:

Lillie McGuckian she/her BSc, MSc, PGCEPhD Doctoral ResearcherCo-lead for Loughborough UNESCO Student NetworkSchool of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences,Loughborough University

This article has been published as part of the Rethinking Curriculum project, kindly funded by The Helen Hamlyn Trust.

 

 

 

 

Adele Darlington, School Artist-in Residence, Holy Trinity Church of England Primary Academy, Handsworth, Birmingham

Context

Holy Trinity Church of England Primary Academy is a one-form entry school serving the diverse community of Handsworth, Birmingham. The school gates, surrounding streets, local shopping centres, businesses and places of worship are characterised by a vast mix of religious and cultural traditions. With more than 32 languages spoken across the school community, this rich diversity is one of Holy Trinity’s greatest strengths and underpins the inclusive ethos that runs through every aspect of school life.

The school has a strong commitment to nurturing high aspirations amongst all of its pupils, striving to excite and inspire every child on roll to achieve their highest potential. It is also equally committed to creating a strong sense of belonging, ensuring that every pupil feels valued, supported and connected to the school community. Respect, compassion and understanding are encouraged amongst pupils, who are taught to celebrate each other’s, and their own, unique qualities.

Holy Trinity is currently in a period of transition. In September 2025, a new headteacher and five class teachers were appointed. Whilst this period of change has brought with it obvious challenges, it has also created fresh opportunities to establish a new shared vision, design a bespoke curriculum and develop an ambitious culture of high expectations for all.

Curriculum and pedagogical approach

The curriculum drivers at Holy Trinity are informed by the work of both Emily Style (1988) and Dr Rudine Sims Bishop (1990) on windows, mirrors, and sliding glass doors. Both works highlight the importance of pupils seeing themselves and their lived experiences reflected in the curriculum (mirrors), while also seeing and developing an understanding of the lives of others (windows). When carefully planned sequences of learning include meaningful representation and relevant enrichment opportunities, the curriculum can act as both a mirror and a window for all pupils. This nurtures both curiosity and connection, enabling learners to step through sliding glass doors into new worlds of learning as confident, globally aware citizens.

Reimagining the art and design curriculum

This case study focuses on the art and design experiences of pupils across the school during the 2025-2026 academic year. It explores the impact of a newly developed approach to art and design, underpinned by the mirrors, windows, and sliding glass doors analogy. This new curriculum was designed and delivered by the school’s subject specialist, with the aim of enriching creative opportunities, developing pupils’ artistic knowledge and skills, and raising the quality of outcomes for all learners.

Research in primary art and design highlights the importance of a representative curriculum in shaping pupils’ understanding of art and identity. Studies demonstrate that the subject has historically been dominated by Eurocentric narratives, which can limit pupils’ perceptions of what art is and who can be an artist (Ofsted, 2023; Holdstock, 2025). Recent guidance from the Researching the arts in primary schools (RAPS) report (2025) and the Visualise: Race and inclusion in secondary school art education report (2024) emphasises the importance of moving beyond this narrow canon to include a broader range of artists and artistic traditions in curriculum design, ensuring representation is meaningful and relevant.

Holy Trinity’s school community was the key driver in the design of this. Before any units of work were developed, conversations between senior leaders and the art specialist established the needs of the school. Data regarding pupils’ ethnicities, religions and lived experiences was carefully considered to ensure mirrors and windows were included for all. The intention was for pupils to encounter a wide range of artists and artworks from different periods, cultures, and contexts. This exposure to a broad spectrum of artistic voices enables pupils to challenge outdated stereotypes of what art is and what an artist looks like.

The curation of such a curriculum requires significant time and careful consideration. Extensive research was undertaken to identify artists who were both relevant to the school’s cohort and able to support the themes, knowledge and skills identified within each unit of learning. To facilitate this work, dedicated curriculum development time was ring-fenced during the school day for the art specialist.

Artists within the curriculum were carefully selected to provide both familiarity and wider global understanding. Local contemporary artists such as Stuart Jarvis and Hurvin Anderson enable pupils to make direct connections to the artistic landscape within their locality, fostering a sense of belonging. Stuart Jarvis’s charcoal studies of Birmingham’s iconic Spaghetti Junction encourage pupils to look closely at familiar landmarks and consider how drawing can be used to capture the character and structure of an environment. Hurvin Anderson, who was born and raised in Handsworth, provides a particularly meaningful local connection, allowing pupils to engage with the work of an internationally recognised artist whose roots lie within their own community.

Other British artists, including Brianna Lois Parker and Tim Fowler, broaden pupils’ understanding of contemporary artistic practice across the country and support engagement with living artists working in diverse ways. Tim Fowler’s work, which explores his Bajan heritage through the painting of plants and flowers that have followed the same migratory journeys as his ancestors, provides opportunities for pupils to consider themes of identity and cultural heritage. Brianna Lois Parker’s artwork Still Life with Bun and Cheese (2025) is explored alongside Paul Cézanne’s nineteenth-century still-life paintings, enabling pupils to make meaningful comparisons between contemporary and historical approaches to composition and the representation of relevant, everyday objects.

International artists such as Ben Enwonwu, Alma Thomas, Benode Behari Mukherjee and Alexander Calder further extend pupils’ knowledge and understanding of the art world, offering insight into a wide range of cultural contexts, materials, and artistic languages.

Pupils experience art and design lessons weekly throughout the school year to ensure regular retrieval of skills and knowledge and continued progression. Lessons are delivered through high-quality direct instruction and clear modelling (including live demonstrations using a visualiser, an easel or a pre-recorded video) to support pupils’ acquisition of key techniques and processes. Independent application and exploration take place in sketchbooks before pupils create their own pieces of artwork. Throughout this process, they are encouraged to self-critique, reflect, and refine their work, developing both confidence and an understanding of how artists improve and evolve their practice.

Impact

The impact of the curriculum has become evident in a relatively short space of time. Engagement in lessons is high, with pupils carrying out self-motivated research and producing artwork at home, which they eagerly bring in to share and add to their sketchbook research pages. This enthusiasm has been strengthened through first-hand communication with some of the artists studied. For example, as part of the ‘Vibrant Blooms’ sequence of learning, Year 3 pupils received a letter and original artwork from Leicester-based artist Tim Fowler. He praised their mixed-media artworks and encouraged their continued journey as artists. Figure 1 presents examples of work produced by pupils during this learning sequence.

Figure 1: Year 3 pupils work inspired by Tim Fowler’s artwork.

   

Similarly, Year 6 took part in a Zoom call with artist Oliver Enwonwu, son of pioneering Nigerian artist Ben Enwonwu, during the ‘Enwonwu’s Dancers’ curriculum sequence. During the session, they were shown examples of Oliver’s artwork and taken on a virtual tour of his art studio. The thoughtful and curious questions pupils asked demonstrated a genuine connection to the artworks and a genuine interest in his artistic processes and ideas. Figure 2 presents examples of work produced by pupils during this learning sequence. Overall, such contact with current artists helped to make the art world real for pupils and supports them to see it as a viable, potential pathway for their futures.

Figure 2: Year 6 pupils work inspired by Ben Enwonwu’s artwork.

Pupil voice gathered in May 2026 was overwhelmingly positive. Pupils commented that they could relate to many of the artists studied and described art and design as enjoyable, creative, and a valuable opportunity for self-expression. One pupil shared, ‘Ben Enwonwu’s family are from the same state in Nigeria as mine. That makes me feel really happy and proud,’ highlighting the importance of representation and cultural connection within the curriculum. Other pupils described the significance of the subject within school life, commenting that ‘art is a big part of our school’ and ‘art is exciting here.’ They also reflected on the creative and emotional value of the subject, explaining that ‘art in our school is a place where you can express yourself’ and ‘art here is fun and creates happiness in our school.’ These responses reflect the growing sense of engagement, belonging, confidence, and enthusiasm fostered through the school’s inclusive art and design curriculum.

Termly art galleries have been incredibly successful, with pupils, families, friends and members of the wider community filling the school hall to view the work produced as part of the new curriculum. Artwork from all year groups is presented as it would be within a professional gallery setting, displayed on boards, arranged on tables, and positioned on plinths to elevate presentation and impact. These events have generated thoughtful conversations about the work on display, strengthening dialogue between pupils, families, and staff. Pupils recognise the importance of these opportunities, with one explaining that ‘art is valued because we have a gallery to share the artwork with other people.’ These gallery showcases have helped to develop a strong sense of pride and have given pupils the experience of having their work publicly exhibited and appreciated by others.

Concluding thoughts

In conclusion, the development of an art and design curriculum shaped by the principles of mirrors, windows, and sliding glass doors has had a significantly positive impact on pupils, staff, and the wider school community at Holy Trinity. Pupils are increasingly engaged and their confidence has grown. They recognise themselves and their experiences within the curriculum, while also developing curiosity and respect for the lives and cultures of others.

Staff at Holy Trinity are committed to building on this work. While the curriculum has had a highly positive impact during this academic year, As new pupils and families join the school, the curriculum will continue to be evaluated to ensure that meaningful opportunities for both mirrors and windows remain embedded across the curriculum. Curriculum refinements will also be informed by emerging artistic trends, exhibitions and developments within the contemporary art world, ensuring that learning remains relevant, current and responsive to the wider cultural landscape

References

Bishop, R.S. (1990) ‘Mirrors, windows, and sliding glass doors’, Perspectives: Choosing and Using Books for the Classroom, 6(3), pp. ix–xi.

Holdstock, K. (2025) ‘Contested and neglected stories of art: A critical study of cultural representation within the primary art curriculum’, Educational Futures, 16(2), pp. 109–131.

Ofsted (2023) Art and design research review. Manchester: Ofsted.

Style, E. (1988) Curriculum as window and mirror. Summit, NJ: Oak Knoll School.

Thomson, P., Hall, C. and Maloy, L. (2025) The RAPS project: Researching the Arts in Primary Schools final report. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.

Runnymede Trust and Freelands Foundation (2024) Visualise: Race and Inclusion in Secondary School Art Education. London: Runnymede Trust.