Introduction to research: Judging the quality and trustworthiness of research evidence

Written By: Author(s):
2 min read
What's the idea? An essential part of being an evidence-based practitioner is being able to judge the quality and trustworthiness of research. However, not being an expert in research, and without some kind of aide-memoire or heuristic, this can be difficult. Thankfully, there are frameworks in place to help you do this. For example, Professor Steve Higgins of Durham University has developed a framework based on the ‘6As of the usefulness of research’ which can help you to do this. Professor Higgins poses the following question: is the research: accessible, accurate, applicable, acceptable, appropriate and actionable? What does it mean? In order to help you make the most of them, Jones (2018) has identified a number of sub-questions for each of the 6 As: Accessible Is the research physically accessible on: Google scholar, The Chartered College of Teaching, the EBSCO database, Open source journals or via direct contact with the author? Who is the audience: practitioner

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's free for trainee teachers and half price for ECTs) or log in if you're already a member.

This article was published in May 2019 and reflects the terminology and understanding of research and evidence in use at the time. Some terms and conclusions may no longer align with current standards. We encourage readers to approach the content with an understanding of this context.

    5 1 vote
    Please Rate this content
    0 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments

    Other content you may be interested in