Introduction to research: Limitations of evidence-based practice

Written By: Author(s):
1 min read
What's the idea? As an evidence-based practitioner, it is important that you are consistently challenging your own pre-conceptions of ‘what works’. Accordingly, it is important to be aware of the limitations and weaknesses of evidence-based practice when used as a basis for making decisions. What does it mean? Hargreaves and Fullan (2012) provide a number of reasons why the case for evidence-based practice can be overstated: evidence-based decisions can be tainted with self-interest cast-iron evidence can get rusty later on evidence-based principles are used very selectively evidence isn’t always self-evident evidence on what to change isn’t the same as how to change positive initiatives based on evidence in one area can inflict collateral damage people can cook the data evidence-based teaching is only somewhat like evidence-based medicine evidence comes from experience as well as research (adapted from Hargreaves and Fullan, p. 47). As someon

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's £1 per year for trainee teachers and half price for ECTs) or log in if you're already a member.

This article was published in May 2019 and reflects the terminology and understanding of research and evidence in use at the time. Some terms and conclusions may no longer align with current standards. We encourage readers to approach the content with an understanding of this context.

    0 0 votes
    Please Rate this content
    0 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted

    Other content you may be interested in