Research-informed practice: Making informed decisions

Written By: Author(s):
1 min read
What’s the idea?
As Drucker (2001, p. 195) states: ‘One alternative is always the alternative of doing nothing.’ What does it mean? You have done your research and think you’ve found an intervention or change which has a sound base. However, just because the evidence base appears to be sound, that in itself is not a good enough reason to adopt the intervention or change. In fact, there are a range of factors that need to be taken into account before deciding whether or not to proceed. Willingham (2012) identifies the following factors worthy of consideration: Implementing a change incurs a cost in time, energy and resources. You must weigh the expected benefits against the anticipated costs Any change you adopt will bring opportunity costs (i.e. the loss of other alternatives when one alternative is chosen) A change may work as described, but may have negative side effects. (For more about side effects, see Zhao, 2018.) What are the implications for teachers? Willingham (2012,

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's free for trainee teachers and half price for ECTs) or log in if you're already a member.

This article was published in May 2019 and reflects the terminology and understanding of research and evidence in use at the time. Some terms and conclusions may no longer align with current standards. We encourage readers to approach the content with an understanding of this context.

    0 0 votes
    Please Rate this content
    0 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments

    Other content you may be interested in