Impact Journal Logo

One-to-one Chromebook technology and student engagement in the independent secondary school classroom: A case study

Written by: Edward Falshaw
7 min read
EDWARD FALSHAW, DEPUTY HEAD, LEIGHTON PARK SCHOOL, UK This research explores educational technology and student engagement in a pragmatic, sequential, mixed-methods case study research project in one independent, co-educational UK secondary school for 11–18-year-old students. The purpose was to understand the perceptions of students and teachers regarding student engagement with one-to-one Chromebook technology in the classroom, and in so doing, recognise how the Chromebook is being used and the opportunities and challenges that it presents when engaging students. The following questions guided this research: How do students and teachers perceive student engagement with Chromebook technology? How do teachers report using Chromebook technology to try to engage students in their learning? What opportunities and challenges do students and teachers perceive the Chromebook to have in relation to student engagement?   Technology Mobile digital technology in educa

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's free for trainee teachers and half price for NQTs) or log in if you're already a member.

    • Alrashidi O, Phan HP and Ngu BH (2016) Academic engagement: An overview of its definitions, dimensions, and major conceptualisations. International Education Studies 9(12): 41–52.
    • Appleton JJ (2018) Student engagement. In: Levesque RJR (ed) Encyclopedia of Adolescence. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 2896–2904.
    • Bergdahl N (2022) Engagement and disengagement in online learning. Computers & Education 188: 104561.
    • Bergdahl N, Fors U, Hernwall P et al. (2018) The use of learning technologies and student engagement in learning activities. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 13: 113–130.
    • Bergdahl N, Nouri J and Fors U (2019) Disengagement, engagement and digital skills in technology-enhanced learning. Education and Information Technologies 25: 957–983.
    • Blikstad-Balas M and Davies C (2017) Assessing the educational value of one-to-one devices: Have we been asking the right questions? Oxford Review of Education 43: 311–331.
    • Bond M, Buntins K, Bendenlier S et al. (2020) Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 17: 2.
    • Castañeda L and Selwyn N (2018) More than tools? Making sense of the ongoing digitizations of higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 15: 1-10.
    • Christodoulou D (2020) Teachers vs Tech: The Case for an Ed Tech Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Fiorillo M (2015) Teacher perception of student engagement in a one-to-one computing environment. EdD Thesis, St Peter’s University, USA.
    • Harper B (2018) Technology and teacher–student interactions: A review of empirical research. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 50(3): 214–225.
    • Kolb L (2017) Learning First, Technology Second: The Educator’s Guide to Designing Authentic Lessons. Portland, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
    • Marres N (2017) Digital Sociology. Cambridge: Polity.
    • Seldon A (2018) The Fourth Education Revolution: Will Artificial Intelligence Liberate or Infantalise Humanity. London: University of Buckingham Press.
    • Selwyn N (2017) Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates. London: Bloomsbury.
    • Sinatra GM, Heddy BC and Lombardi D (2015) The Challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychologist 50: 1–13.
    • Sproat L (2017) What technology should we use in the classroom? In: James D (ed) World Class: Tackling the Ten Biggest Challenges Facing Schools Today. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 91–93.
    0 0 votes
    Please Rate this content
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    0 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments

    From this issue

    Impact Articles on the same themes