Dr David Preece, Head of Geography, Teach First, UK On his return to blogging, Joe Kirby argued that teachers lead the ‘scientific revolution in education’, showing the stages of adoption from 1999’s ‘What Works Clearinghouse’ approach (DfE, 2010) towards the ResearchEd movement (Kirby, 2021). He cites a linear development of key articles, implicitly suggesting progression of knowledge accumulated, and points towards a range of schools and thinkers who have grown in the ‘cognitive science’ era (Boxer, 2019; Sealy, 2020; Willingham, 2009). Whether directly intended or not, Kirby’s article echoed the language of Thomas Kuhn’s 1962 philosophical and sociological work on The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and the progress of scientific language and progression thinking that have come to be applied to the cognitive science ‘paradigm’ in modern pedagogical discourse. But it is far from clear whether education and science have consistent parallels, and whether
A curriculum paradigm? Thinking about curriculum with Thomas Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Written by: David Preece
11 min read
- Boxer A (2019) The ResearchED Guide to Explicit & Direct Instruction: An Evidence Informed Guide for Teachers. Woodbridge: John Catt.
- Department for Education (DfE) (2010) The importance of teaching: The schools white paper 2010. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-importance-of-teaching-the-schools-white-paper-2010 (accessed 15 November 2021).
- Edovald T and Nevill C (2021) Working out what works: The case of the Education Endowment Foundation in England. ENCU Review of Education 4(1): 46–64.
- Kirby J (2021) Teachers lead the scientific revolution in education: 44+ seminal articles. In: Pragmatic Education. Available at: https://pragmaticreform.wordpress.com/2021/08/28/scientific-revolution (accessed 30 August 2021).
- Kuhn T (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Kuhn T (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Kuhn T (1987) What are scientific revolutions? In: Kruger L, Daston LJ and Heidelberger M (eds) The Probablistic Revolution, Volume I: Ideas in History. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 7–22. Available at: www.units.miamioh.edu/technologyandhumanities/kuhn.htm (accessed 15 November 2021).
- Kuhn and Hacking (2012) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50th Anniversary Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Naughton J (2012) Thomas Kuhn: The man who changed the way the world looked at science. The Observer, 19 August, 12. Available at: www.theguardian.com/science/2012/aug/19/thomas-kuhn-structure-scientific-revolutions (accessed 30 August 2021).
- Ofsted (2019) Education inspection framework: Overview of research. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/963625/Research_for_EIF_framework_updated_references_22_Feb_2021.pdf (accessed 30 August 2021).
- Ofsted (2021) Research review series: Geography. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/publications/research-review-series-geography (accessed 30 August 2021).
- Popper (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Sealy C (2020) The ResearchED Guide to The Curriculum: An Evidence Informed Guide for Teachers. Woodbridge: John Catt.
- Snow CP (1959) The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution, The Rede Lecture: 1959, 7th ed (published 1961). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Sweller (1988) Cognitive Load during Problem Solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science 12: 257–285.
- Watson E and Busch B (2021) The Science of Learning: 99 Studies that Every Teacher Needs to Know, 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Willingham D (2009) Why Don’t Students Like School? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Please login to comment
View all comments