Impact Journal Logo

A curriculum paradigm? Thinking about curriculum with Thomas Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions

Written by: David Preece
11 min read
Dr David Preece, Head of Geography, Teach First, UK  On his return to blogging, Joe Kirby argued that teachers lead the ‘scientific revolution in education’, showing the stages of adoption from 1999’s ‘What Works Clearinghouse’ approach (DfE, 2010) towards the ResearchEd movement (Kirby, 2021). He cites a linear development of key articles, implicitly suggesting progression of knowledge accumulated, and points towards a range of schools and thinkers who have grown in the ‘cognitive science’ era (Boxer, 2019; Sealy, 2020; Willingham, 2009). Whether directly intended or not, Kirby’s article echoed the language of Thomas Kuhn’s 1962 philosophical and sociological work on The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and the progress of scientific language and progression thinking that have come to be applied to the cognitive science ‘paradigm’ in modern pedagogical discourse. But it is far from clear whether education and science have consistent parallels, and whether

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's free for trainee teachers and half price for NQTs) or log in if you're already a member.

0 0 votes
Please Rate this content
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

From this issue

Impact Articles on the same themes

Author(s): David Leat