Impact Journal Logo

Developing dispositions

Written by: Hanna Miller
7 min read

In sport, we often refer to what is known as a ‘challenge vs threat’ state: the idea that performers need to feel they have the knowledge, resources and external support to take on the challenges that face them. Similarly in a classroom context, each time a student walks into a class, they make a judgement as to whether they should attempt a task, based on their perceived level of capability (Jones M McCarthy et al., 2009). The goal within the 14 schools that form our trust is to shift as many students as possible from the ‘What’s the point of me even trying?’ or ‘I can’t do that’ mindsets towards the ‘Yes, I’ll give that a go’ mindset. In order to do this in a persuasive and relevant way for students at a primary and secondary level, we have engaged with the work of Costa and Kallick (Costa and Kallick, 2006) on the ‘habits of mind’ (Figure 1), with habits of mind defined as ‘the characteristics of what intelligent people do when they are confronted with problems, the resolutions to which are not immediately apparent’.

Figure 1: The 16 habits of mind

Habit of mind Meaning in an educational context
Persistence Students continue with a task by using the tools available to them, and do not give up at the first hurdle. They seek support from peers and use all resources to find alternative avenues to success if struggling.
Managing impulsivity Students think before acting and consider different courses of action, through planning exercises that allow them to contemplate the consequences of actions.
Striving for accuracy Students aspire to be exact and master the demands of a task. They carefully use success criteria to self- and peer-assess.
Clarity and precision Students convey thoughts accurately when speaking, listening and writing. They consider appropriate use of vocabulary and gesture.
Empathy and understanding Students are aware that not everyone will have the same view as them and they consider alternative perspectives. They are encouraged to actively seek to understand how certain perspectives have formed.
Skills of interdependence Students have opportunities to productively work with others to understand and apply content. They learn from others through discussing, supporting and challenging ideas.
Wonderment and awe Teachers are conscious to develop curiosity within their subjects, actively linking content to relevant real-life situations and sharing impressive findings within the subject.
Finding humour Opportunities are provided to be fun and playful with ideas.
Creating, imagining, innovating Students strive for enough subject knowledge to produce original ideas in a particular area.
Applying past knowledge to new situations Previous knowledge is referred to, and past performance and accomplishments are understood in order to encourage students to consider how previous experiences could support understanding in a new setting.
Thinking flexibly Sometimes drip-feeding information to encourage students to consider how viewpoints can change.
Remaining open to continuous learning Students enjoy learning and are keen to add to knowledge and skills. They are not fearful of not knowing an answer and trying new techniques.
Questioning and posing problems Students ask thoughtful, higher-order questions. They trial their own strategies to solve problems.
Gathering data using all senses Students are provided with a variety of learning opportunities that do not just focus on the auditory and visual forms of delivery. Students use all senses to source information to develop understanding.
Metacognition Students are aware of their own thoughts, feelings and actions. They reflect on their strengths and areas for development independently.
Taking responsible risks Students are provided with opportunities to take calculated risks. Students are prepared to answer questions and give opinions, even if not 100% sure. They are confident to move outside of their comfort zones.

We had long felt, quite anecdotally, that those students who were achieving successful outcomes were those who had positive dispositions AND a strong knowledge base. Our question then became: How can we ensure that ‘spongy students’, who seem to suck up information, become more critical and more independently confident? The staff body initially felt that the habits of mind were already being developed in tandem with the content and skills within each subject area; however, without formalised methods of tracking, how could we be sure that we were effectively developing these habits to their full capacity? We therefore attempted to identify a set of flexible criteria to encourage staff and learners to intentionally monitor their progress towards embodying each habit –whilst appreciating that the journey is more about getting better rather than ‘meeting milestones’.

The integration of the habits of mind into each school was never intended to be a magic bullet to suddenly make students better citizens or suddenly improve their learning –it was more about making an explicit claim that we valued these habits and were looking to gradually evolve the current culture to more intentionally appreciate the symbiotic relationship between dispositional development and subject-specific knowledge. After all, there were some students who thought that their habits and behaviours were fixed, much like their intelligence, and we saw it as our role to challenge some of these existing long-held beliefs by providing our students with meaningful strategies to grow more positive learning dispositions. For example, to develop persistence, do not just keep trying aimlessly; instead, use all available resources –i.e. peers, the teacher and textbooks –to provide alternative ways to progress. Without these strategies, students’ efforts to develop habits could be futile.

Figure 2 provides an overview of the stages of habit development that we have been trialling within our trust as a result of a cross-phase working party, who are currently researching and collecting different forms of data from staff and students that focuses on journeys of development.

Figure 2: An overview of the stages of habit development within our schools

This diagram is not suggesting that the final box is an end point or an expected outcome – it instead demonstrates the stages we have identified towards getting better, which requires commitment and time, especially when some less desirable habits are already well engrained.

In order to measure the impact of the habit interventions taking place, some schools have circulated self-report pre- and post-questionnaires to garner immediate and short-term impacts, which have then informed decisions regarding next steps. Questions for children include a range of closed questions, e.g. ‘I like working on my own when solving problems’, with a 4-point Likert rating, and open-ended questions, e.g. ‘The characteristics that make me a good learner are…’ The data collated, in addition to structured observations, enables us to look for how vocabulary is developing over time and to look for certain comparisons to be made, whilst also allowing us to monitor in which subjects students feel that they are developing. We are aware that habits can be seen as domain-specific, but we are keen to understand the conditions in each subject that allow for this development to occur.

According to Burgess (Burgess, 2012), a structured habits of mind programme, with training, resources and facilitator guidance as an intervention, had positive effects on young children with challenging behaviours. We have found across the trust that training sessions for staff on the underpinning of the habits initiative, followed by whole-staff ownership of developing bespoke interpretations and resources to integrate the language and ideals to meet the needs of their specific learners, has provided positive correlations with decreases in students receiving negative behaviour points, as well as observable improvements in attitudes to learning.

In some of the schools in which ‘habit points’ are being administered, we have high levels of students who were previously recording poor behaviour points now receiving positive habit points. In line with work by Burgess (2012), we also found that certain habits have developed at a quicker rate than others. Staff are exercising criticality when reporting data findings and are keen to further explore current pitfalls, such as the subjectivity of what constitutes a ‘habit point’. This has led to important staff dialogue and insightful smaller-scale studies taking place in department areas and year groups to measure the possible impacts of the habit interventions on learning in more specific domains.

The habits of mind are infused throughout all areas of school life, and our goal is to include parents and carers more in understanding, tracking and striving to develop the habits that mean we are more confident in our capabilities. We are mindful of our role in modelling successful habits and equipping our students with the strategies to develop successful habits and become the best version of themselves in preparation for the ever-changing world that lurks beyond the school gates.

Further Reading

Marzano R (2005) A Different Kind of Classroom: Teaching with Dimensions of Learning. Heatherton: Hawker Brownlow Education.

Murray J (2016) Skills development, habits of mind, and the spiral curriculum: A dialectical approach to undergraduate general education curriculum mapping. Cogent Education 3(1).

Quigley A (2016) The Confident Teacher: Developing Successful Habits of Mind, Body and Pedagogy. Oxon: Routledge.

Yeager DS, Romero C, Paunesku D et al. (2016) Using design thinking to improve psychological interventions: The case of the growth mindset during the transition to high school. Journal of Educational Psychology 108(3): 374–391.

References

Burgess J (2012) The impact of teaching thinking skills as habits of mind to young children with challenging behaviours. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties 17(1): 47–63.
Costa A and Kallick B (2006) Discovering and Exploring Habits of Mind. Alexandria: ASCD.
Jones M McCarthy M, Meijen C and McCarthy P (2009) A theory of challenge and threat states in athletes. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 2: 161–180.
    0 0 votes
    Article Rating
    0 Comments
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments

    From this issue

    Impact Articles on the same themes