Facing the Goldilocks dilemma: Is there too much or too little educational research?

Written by: Julia Flutter
6 min read
JULIA FLUTTER, PROFESSIONAL DOCTORATE RESEARCHER, FACULTY OF EDUCATION, UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE, UK At the Learning and Teaching Conference 2023 at the University of Edinburgh, Professor Gert Biesta raised a few eyebrows in his keynote address, challenging the audience with an important question: How much research does teaching need? Was Biesta was more likely to argue that too much, rather than too little, educational research is currently on offer? In fact, he went on to suggest that although there is a great deal of research, not all of this evidence supports the needs of educational practitioners. Too much educational research is narrowly focused and brackets out questions about values, in Biesta’s view:  On the research side, evidence-based education seems to favour a technocratic model in which it is assumed that the only relevant research questions are questions about the effectiveness of educational means and techniques, forgetting, among other things, that what counts as

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's free for trainee teachers and half price for ECTs) or log in if you're already a member.

    • Biddulph J and Flutter J (eds) (2021) Inspiring Primary Curriculum Design. Abingdon: Routledge.
    • Biesta GJJ (2007) Why ‘what works’ won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory 57: 1–22.
    • Biesta GJJ (2015) Resisting the seduction of the global education measurement industry: Notes on the social psychology of PISA. Ethics and Education 10(3): 348–360.
    • Biesta GJJ (2023) How much research does teaching need? A case for thoughtful teaching. In: Learning and Teaching Conference 2023, University of Edinburgh, UK, 27 June 2023. Available at: https://blogs.ed.ac.uk/learning-teaching-conference-2023/keynote-3-professor-gert-biesta (accessed 28 June 2024).
    • Burnard P and Loughrey M (eds) (2022) Sculpting New Creativities in Primary Education. Abingdon: Routledge.
    • Dunne R and Martin E (2021) Learning to learn from nature: How principles of Harmony in the natural world can guide curriculum design. In: Biddulph J and Flutter J (eds) Inspiring Primary Curriculum Design. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 81–96.
    • Frost D, Ball S, Hill V et al. (2018) Teachers as Agents of Change: A Masters Programme Designed, Led and Taught by Teachers. Letchworth: HertsCam Network.
    • Hargreaves E and Rolls L (2021) Reimagining Professional Development in Schools. Abingdon: Routledge.
    • Jackson J (1894) The Theory and Practice of Handwriting. New York: William Beverley Harison.
    • Loughrey M and Gerver R (2022) Innovating change through creativities curricula. In: Burnard P and Loughrey M (eds) Sculpting New Creativities in Primary Education. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 91–106.
    • Peacock A (2021) The importance of the Chartered College of Teaching: A professional body for the future identity and status of our teachers. In: Hargreaves E and Rolls L (eds) Reimagining Professional Development in Schools. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 9–22.
    • Sutton R, Downham L and Rhodes H (2021) ‘Why do I have to sit down?’: Designing an age-appropriate curriculum for children in Year 1. In: Biddulph J and Flutter J (eds) Inspiring Primary Curriculum Design. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 63–80.
    0 0 votes
    Please Rate this content
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    0 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments

    From this issue

    Impact Articles on the same themes