From the editor

Written by: David Leat
8 min read
David Leat, Professor of Curriculum Innovation, Newcastle University, UK Introduction Teachers are curriculum makers. Whatever is mandated in National Curriculum documents or signalled in the Ofsted inspection framework, there is still a long step from the ink on the page to the classroom. However, policy developments over the last 30 plus years have not necessarily resulted in sufficient focus in practice on this critical aspect of teachers’ professionalism. Despite notional freedoms in curriculum, Greany and Waterhouse (2016) provide evidence that comparatively few schools use those freedoms and readers will be familiar with the many arguments about the narrowing of curriculum and ‘teaching to the test’. Parker and Leat (2021) found that many primary teachers in a given sample did not see themselves as curriculum makers and instead saw the curriculum as something they delivered, not something they developed. They report: ‘one teacher positioned curriculum as the “rules a

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's free for trainee teachers and half price for ECTs) or log in if you're already a member.

    • Greany T and Waterhouse J (2016) Rebels against the system: Leadership agency and curriculum innovation in the context of school autonomy and accountability in England. International Journal of Educational Management.
    • Hirsch ED (2009) The Making of Americans: Democracy and our Schools. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
    • Manyukhina Y and Wyse D (2019) Learner agency and the curriculum: A critical realist perspective. The Curriculum Journal 30(3): 223–243.
    • Parker G and Leat D (2021) The case of curriculum development in England: Oases in a curriculum desert?. In Curriculum Making in Europe: Policy and Practice within and Across Diverse Contexts. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 151–174.
    • Priestley M, Alvunger D, Philippou S and Soini T (2021) Curriculum Making: A Conceptual Framing. In Curriculum Making in Europe: Policy and Practice Within and Across Diverse Contexts. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 1–27.
    • Sachs J (2016) Teacher professionalism: Why are we still talking about it?. Teachers and Teaching 22(4): 413–425.
    • Schiro M (2012) Curriculum Theory: Conflicting Visions and Enduring Concerns. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
    • Sfard A (1998) On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher 27(2): 4–13.
    • Wrigley T (2018) ‘Knowledge’, curriculum and social justice. The Curriculum Journal 29(1): 4–24.
    • Young M (2013) Overcoming the crisis in curriculum theory: A knowledge-based approach. Journal of Curriculum Studies 45(2): 101–118.
    0 0 votes
    Please Rate this content
    0 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments

    From this issue

    Impact Articles on the same themes