Rethinking curriculum development: The risks of driving standardisation at scale, and alternative approaches to building teacher professionalism

8 min read
AMARBEER SINGH GILL, AMBITION INSTITUTE & GREENSHAW RESEARCH SCHOOL, UK NICK POINTER, AMBITION INSTITUTE, UK Introduction In the past decade, there has been significant emphasis on curriculum in UK schooling (Allen et al., 2021). Prior to this, research suggested that curriculum thinking had  been under-prioritised in favour of generic approaches to teaching and learning (e.g. Ofsted, 2019a) and that there had been a narrowing of the curriculum in response to accountability pressures (Oates, 2017; Spielman, 2017,. Six years later, while policy changes like the reformed Ofsted Education Inspection Framework (EIF) (2019a) appear to have led to increased curriculum activity in schools (DfE, 2025), research suggests that there is still significant variability in outcomes based on socio-economic status (Beynon, 2024). In this article, we examine some of the approaches that schools and trusts have taken to curriculum development in the light of policy reforms and evaluate the impac

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's free for trainee teachers and half price for ECTs) or log in if you're already a member.

    0 0 votes
    Please Rate this content
    0 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments

    From this issue

    Impact Articles on the same themes