What are we teaching? Teacher professionalism and the ideological battleground of curriculum

Written by: Richard Bustin
8 min read
RICHARD BUSTIN, DIRECTOR OF PEDAGOGY, INNOVATION AND STAFF DEVELOPMENT AND HEAD OF GEOGRAPHY, LANCING COLLEGE, UK Introduction It is very easy to leave the grand thinking about curriculum – what we choose to teach our children in schools and why – to others, such as senior leaders, textbook writers and exam authorities. Yet knowing what we want to teach the young people in front of us should be at the heart of our professionalism. If a traditional curriculum sees the prominence of knowledge being learned, then a more progressive curriculum puts the perceived needs of the child at the centre of thinking. For some of us, teaching is mainly about introducing students to some of the greatest thinking that humanity has been able to achieve; for others, it is about inculcating a set of values deemed worthy to society. For others still, it is about getting students to pass a set of exams. While all of these might play a role in a modern school, the contested notion of what we choose to

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's free for trainee teachers and half price for NQTs) or log in if you're already a member.

    • Béneker T, Bladh G and Lambert D (2024) Exploring ‘Future three’ curriculum scenarios in practice: Learning from the GeoCapabilities project. The Curriculum Journal 35(3): 396–411.
    • Bustin R (2024) What Are We Teaching? Powerful Knowledge and a Capabilities Curriculum. Carmarthen: Crown House.
    • Elkins J (ed) (2012) What Do Artists Know? Volume 3 of the Stone Art Theory Institutes. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
    • Enser M and Enser Z (2021) The CPD Curriculum: Creating Conditions for Growth. Carmarthen: Crown House.
    • Evans M (2019) Leaders with Substance: An Antidote to Leadership Genericism in Schools. Woodbridge: John Catt.
    • Furedi F (2007) Introduction: Politics, politics, politics. In: Whelan R (ed) The Corruption of the Curriculum. London: Civitas, pp. 1–10.
    • Puttick S and Murrey A (2020) Confronting the deafening silence on race in geography education in England: Learning from anti-racist, decolonial and Black geographies. Geography 105(3): 127–134.
    • Rawling E (2000) Ideology, politics and curriculum change: Reflections on school geography 2000. Geography 85(3): 209–220.
    • Young M (2008) Bringing Knowledge Back In: From Social Constructivism to Social Realism in the Sociology of Education. Abingdon: Routledge.
    • Young M and Muller J (2010) Three educational scenarios for the future: Lessons from the sociology of knowledge. European Journal of Education 45(1): 11–27.
    0 0 votes
    Please Rate this content
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    0 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments

    From this issue

    Impact Articles on the same themes