When ‘challenging behaviour’ is unmet need: Reframing behaviour through an inclusive lens

7 min read
RABIA SHUNAID KHAN, HEAD OF INCLUSION, GEMS FOUNDERS SCHOOL, NAD AL HAMAR, DUBAI, UAE Introduction In many classrooms, behaviour continues to be viewed through a lens of compliance, with students who call out, refuse tasks or withdraw from learning often labelled as ‘challenging’. Behaviour policies commonly rely on sanctions, warnings and removal from class, reflecting the assumption that behaviour is primarily a matter of choice (Sugai and Horner, 2002). However, behaviour does not occur in isolation; it is shaped by interaction, context and underlying need (Watzlawick et al., 1967). For many learners, particularly those with additional needs, behaviours such as disruption, avoidance or disengagement may reflect anxiety, sensory overload, communication difficulties or learning frustration, rather than deliberate non-compliance (Dockrell and Lindsay, 2001; Law et al., 2017). When these behaviours are interpreted solely as defiance, responses often fail to address their under

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's £1 per year for trainee teachers and half price for ECTs) or log in if you're already a member.

    • Ainscow M (2020) Promoting equity in education: Lessons from international experiences. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy 6(1): 7–16.
    • Bear GG (2010) School Discipline and Self-Discipline: A Practical Guide to Promoting Prosocial Student Behavior. New York: Guilford Press.
    • Dockrell JE and Lindsay G (2001) Children with specific speech and language difficulties: The teachers’ perspective. Oxford Review of Education 27(3): 369–394.
    • Durand VM (1993) Functional communication training using assistive devices: Effects on challenging behaviour. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 26(3): 369–380.
    • Emerson A (2022) The case for trauma-informed behaviour policies in schools. Pastoral Care in Education 40(4): 378–391.
    • Evertson CM and Weinstein CS (eds) (2006) Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    • Florian L and Black-Hawkins K (2011) Exploring inclusive pedagogy. British Educational Research Journal 37(5): 813–828.
    • Law J, Charlton J, Dockrell J et al. (2017) Early language development: Needs, provision and intervention for preschool children from socio-economically disadvantaged backgrounds. Education Endowment Foundation. Available at: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/evidence-reviews/early-language (accessed 10 August 2026).
    • Noddings N (2013) Caring: A Relational Approach to Ethics and Moral Education, 2nd ed. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
    • Satir V, Banmen J, Gerber J et al. (1991) The Satir Model: Family Therapy and Beyond. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
    • Sugai G and Horner RH (2002) The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide positive behavior supports. Child & Family Behavior Therapy 24(1–2): 23–50.
    • Watzlawick P, Bavelas JB and Jackson DD (1967) Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies, and Paradoxes. New York: WW Norton & Company.
    0 0 votes
    Please Rate this content
    0 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted

    From this issue

    Impact Articles on the same themes