Impact Journal Logo

The currency of assessment for learners with SEND

Written by: Alistair Crawford
7 min read
ALISTAIR CRAWFORD, NATIONAL NETWORK OF SPECIALIST PROVISION (NNSP), UK This article explores aspirations and meaningful outcomes beyond the school gates through the perspective of ‘experts by experience’. … this problem of deficit framing is located within the wider societal issue of the meritocracy, life’s “sorting principle” which has narrowed what we perceive a “good life” to be and what is valued by schools and across society. (Newmark and Rees, 2022, p. 13) Newmark and Rees (2022) explore the challenges of meritocracy for learners with additional needs, identifying how narrow measures to assess progress and success will more than likely lead to an education system in which there are ‘winners and losers’. Sadly, for many learners with SEND (special educational needs and disability), they will fall into the latter category. The Institute of Health Equity’s paper ‘A fair, supportive society’ (Rickard and Donkin, 2018) shares shocking statistics about

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's free for trainee teachers and half price for NQTs) or log in if you're already a member.

    0 0 votes
    Please Rate this content
    Notify of
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments

    From this issue

    Impact Articles on the same themes

    Author(s): Bill Lucas