Developing metalinguistic talk through teacher–researcher partnership

Written by:
7 min read
You can listen to an audio version of this article above. RUTH NEWMAN, ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR IN LANGUAGE AND LITERACY EDUCATION, UNIVERSITY OF EXETER, UK Introduction A large body of research illustrates the benefits of talk for learning (Mercer and Littleton, 2007; Wegerif, 2013; Jay et al., 2017), recognising that ‘Of all the tools for educational intervention in students’ development, talk is perhaps the most pervasive in its use and powerful in its possibilities’ (Alexander, 2020, p. 15). While much has been written about the benefits of talk for writing (Fisher et al., 2010; Corbett and Strong, 2017), research indicates the particular value of classroom talk that supports thinking about writerly choice (e.g. Myhill and Newman, 2016, 2019). ‘Metalinguistic talk’ is a term used to describe talk specifically about language use. This metalinguistic talk, which can support learners’ capacity to better craft and control their writing, can occur in various forms – for exam

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's £1 per year for trainee teachers and half price for ECTs) or log in if you're already a member.

    • Alexander R (2020) A Dialogic Teaching Companion. Oxon: Routledge.
    • Barak M and Lefstein A (2022) Opening texts for discussion: Developing dialogic reading stances. Reading Research Quarterly 57(2): 449–468.
    • Boyd M and Markarian W (2015) Dialogic teaching and dialogic stance: Moving beyond interactional form. Research in the Teaching of English 49(3): 272–296.
    • Corbett P and Strong J (2017) Talk for Writing Across the Curriculum: How to Teach Non-Fiction Writing to 5–12 Year-Olds. London: Open University Press.
    • Fisher R, Jones S, Larkin S et al. (2010) Using Talk to Support Writing. London: SAGE.
    • Jay T, Willis B, Thomas P et al. (2017) Dialogic teaching: Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. Available at: https://shura.shu.ac.uk/17014/1/Dialogic_Teaching_Evaluation_Report.pdf (accessed 22 November 2023).
    • Lefstein A and Snell J (2014) Better Than Best Practice: Developing Teaching and Learning Through Dialogue. Oxon: Routledge.
    • Mercer N and Littleton K (2007) Dialogue and the Development of Children’s Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach. Oxon: Routledge.
    • Myhill D and Newman R (2016) Metatalk: Enabling metalinguistic discussion about writing. International Journal of Educational Research 80: 177–187.
    • Myhill D and Newman R (2019) Writing talk: Developing metalinguistic understanding through dialogic teaching. In: Mercer N, Wegerif R and Major L (eds) The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Dialogic Education. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 360–372.
    • Myhill D, Newman R, Watson A et al. (2022) Writing dialogues: Metalinguistic talk about writing. In: Solheim R, Otnes H and Rijs-Johansen M (eds) Samtale, Saskrive, Samhandle. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, pp. 71–93.
    • O’Connor C and Michaels S (2019) Supporting teachers in taking up productive talk moves: The long road to professional learning at scale. International Journal of Educational Research 97: 166–175.
    • Steinbeck J (1994) Of Mice and Men. Reprint edition. New York: Penguin Classics.
    • Wells HG (2017) The Time Machine. Reissue edition. London: Penguin Random House.
    • Wegerif R (2013) Dialogic: Education for the Internet Age. Oxon: Routledge.
    0 0 votes
    Please Rate this content
    0 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted

    From this issue

    Impact Articles on the same themes