A coaching pedagogy for autonomy and agency in the classroom

Written by:
6 min read
KIRSTY NUNN, HEAD OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, MILLFIELD SCHOOL, SOMERSET, UK Context and rationale Developing independent learners is a widely stated aim across education. However, students often remain dependent on teacher guidance, particularly when faced with challenge. In computer science, this is especially evident during programming tasks, where students frequently seek rapid reassurance rather than persisting independently. Research on self-efficacy and self-regulation suggests that engagement with challenge is shaped by beliefs about control, competence and agency (Bandura, 1977; Zimmerman, 2002). When difficulty is interpreted as inability rather than a feature of learning, avoidance and premature help-seeking behaviours emerge. At Millfield, a school with a longstanding reputation for excellence in sport, coaching is beyond instructions and instead is framed as the development of performers who can make decisions under pressure, regulate their responses and adapt in real ti

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's free for trainee teachers and half price for ECTs) or log in if you're already a member.

    • Avilés-Dávila AF, Palacio MEM and Valle CDG (2023) Impact of coaching on the development of personal and social competences among secondary school students. Children 10(6): 1025.
    • Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84(2): 191–215.
    • Collins D and Carson HJ (2018) The coach–athlete relationship: A critical review. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 11(1): 1–21.
    • Deci EL and Ryan RM (2000) The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 11(4): 227–268.
    • Faja S, Clarkson T, Gilbert R et al. (2022) A preliminary randomised controlled trial of executive function training for children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism 26(2): 346–360.
    • Hagiwara M, Shogren KA, Lane KL et al. (2020) Development of the self-determined learning model of instruction coaching model. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities 55(1): 17–27.
    • Immordino-Yang MH (2015) Emotions, Learning, and the Brain: Exploring the Educational Implications of Affective Neuroscience. New York: WW Norton.
    • Mor T and Moreno EM (2025) The effect of a cognitive-behavioral coaching model on improving academic performance of ADHD adolescents. Educational Process: International Journal 14: e2025010.
    • Oettingen G (2014) Rethinking Positive Thinking: Inside the New Science of Motivation. New York: Penguin.
    • Stanton JD, Sebesta AJ and Dunlosky J (2021) Fostering metacognition to support student learning and performance. CBE – Life Sciences Education 20(2): fe3.
    • Zimmerman BJ (2002) Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice 41(2): 64–70.
    0 0 votes
    Please Rate this content
    0 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments

    From this issue

    Impact Articles on the same themes