The author of this article is an Associate at Unlike Minds, an organisation that offers chargeable consultancy services in many fields including education.
This paper presents teachers’ self-reported findings about the effects of mindfulness and meditation on student behaviour in three primary schools situated in areas with multiple deprivation indicators. Schools first participated in a programme to teach staff (and students) about how brains learn via four workshops, and chose to apply aspects of educational neuroscience to their teaching practice. In all three schools, senior management and teaching staff elected to adopt the practice of meditation for two reasons: to help students learn to self-regulate their emotions and place themselves in an emotional state conducive to learning; and to strengthen their ability to focus/resist distractions.
Teachers reported the impact to be better than expected, as not only did the meditation practices improve emotion regulation and focus, but they also had two further benefits: a reduction in transition time between break times and lessons, and a general change to the whole-school culture for learning. This paper explores these effects, using interview data from 10 teachers and leaders and a student focus group.
Background
As findings from neuroscience, psychology and education are more readily shared, it becomes increasingly obvious that learning sits within an emotional plane: neurobiological evidence shows ‘that learning, attention, decision making and social functioning are all both profoundly affected by and subsumed within emotional processes’ (Immordino-Yang and Damasio, 2007, p. 3). Pre-adolescence is a key period, during which the neural networks underpinning the complex methods of self-regulation are developed. Self-regulation requires two key processes: attention control, which includes the ability to resolve conflict, to resist distraction and to focus attention; and emotion regulation, the modification of how emotions are both expressed and experienced (Kaunhoven and Dorjee, 2017). However, students can find the school environment and its complex social structure stressful and distracting – brain states that make learning more difficult.
Fear and attention
The limbic system, or ‘emotional centre’, sits deep within the midbrain. It contains the amygdala, which has evolved to be extremely efficient at preparing the body for fight or flight; it receives all types of stimuli (e.g. visual, auditory) directly from the senses and reacts before the signal is relayed to the conscious, decision-making cortex for analysis. This explains why we can react to potential danger before we are even aware of it – for example, by flinching. This swift response interrupts existing brain processes not required for survival, such as learning phonics, in order to prepare the body to react to a potentially dangerous situation. The fear response also helps us to avoid similarly dangerous situations in the future, as the amygdala is also involved in the creation of long-term memories related to sad or fearful events, hence emotional episodes are more vividly remembered than neutral ones (Blakemore and Frith, 2000).
Thus, the state of fear has a negative effect on learning at school, a place that focuses on the development of brain processes that are not essential for physical survival. Brain researchers agree that ‘negative emotions block learning’ (OECD, 2002, p. 66). When learning environments are stressful, the amygdala becomes overstimulated and enters a hypermetabolic state in which ‘information cannot pass from sensory awareness into the memory connection and storage regions of the brains’ (Willis, 2006, p. 58). Cortical activity is also affected by physiological responses triggered by the limbic system, such as increased heart rate and elevated adrenaline levels. Research using fMRI scans has demonstrated what many good teachers (and most students!) will know already: that ‘superior learning takes place when stress is lowered’ (Willis, 2006, p. 59).
When teachers are able to understand the relationship between emotional state and learning, there is a significant (positive) academic effect. Indeed, ‘setting the emotional climate for learning may be the most important task a teacher embarks on each day’ (Hardiman, 2012, p. 34). Meditation practices have been shown to have ‘a pivotal impact on developmental outcomes including social and emotional wellbeing and academic functioning’ (Kaunhoven and Dorjee, 2017, p. 164). Meditation can ‘help students to enhance academic and psychosocial strengths and improve self-regulation capacities and coping abilities’ (Wisner et al., 2010). There is a wealth of meditation programmes available and written for schools, such as the .b mindfulness programme. All three UK evaluations of this intervention show that it has a significant positive impact on student resilience and stress (Clarke et al., 2015) – findings that are reflected in two other reviews of international studies of mindfulness at school (Burke, 2010; Harnett and Dawe, 2012).
Method
Ten staff (head and assistant headteachers, classroom and learning support teachers) from three schools were interviewed individually, three to four terms after first participating in the educational neuroscience programme. This covered, for example, brain plasticity, memory, and the role of emotions and the limbic system in learning. The schools had been using meditation practices for between two and three terms. The interviews used open-ended questions and were video-recorded, with transcripts typed up later. A focus group of 11 Year 6s from one primary school was interviewed and responses typed during the interview. The data was then thematically analysed. This involved categorising responses according to the themes that emerged from the data – for example, some responses related to the emergent theme ‘emotional regulation’.
Analysis
The predominant theme that emerged from the data was the belief that meditation had had a profoundly beneficial effect on student behaviour. The meditation practices took many forms and were chosen by teachers according to an informal action-research approach, including: listening to guided aural meditations; following on-screen yoga-based movements; listening to calming music; mindful yoga and colouring; and breathing exercises, visualisation and massage. Responses formed four themes described below, with examples summarised in Table 1.
Emotional regulation
When describing the catchment area, all schools identified deprivation problems such as parental unemployment, gang warfare, alcohol-related violence, poor language and lack of parental support. Consequently, students often arrived in a state of stress, lacking equipment, and anxiety sometimes increased as home-time neared. Following meditation, teachers reported that children, including those with behavioural problems, were able to settle down to work more rapidly and appeared calmer and more resilient. Students also said that meditation helped to reduce their stress.
Focus
Following meditation, teachers reported that students were better able to focus and readier to learn. It was described as an effective form of classroom management, and calming music and images were frequently used as cues for learning. Learning to focus on a mindful task improved concentration, and taught students how to ‘re-centre’ – described by a headteacher as life skill. Students concurred.
Transitions
Transitioning between busy break-times to calm classrooms is a challenge; however, teachers found that using meditative images or sounds as cues for learning helped students to settle into the lesson more quickly. One school was so pleased with the effect of music that they played relaxing piano music through the corridors, reporting that not only did students (and staff) arrive in classrooms in a calmer state but that lessons could also begin more promptly.
Whole-school culture for learning
All respondents stated their desire to continue using meditative practices in the future, as they believed it benefited the whole-school environment, to the extent that governors noticed. Teaching students to take time to calm busy/frenetic minds, to focus on a mindful task and to recognise when they needed to take a ‘mindful minute’ were skills that had altered the schools’ culture for learning for the better. Students themselves said that they enjoyed meditation, and a meditation club at one school was very popular.
Conclusion
The uptake of mindfulness and meditation practices was widespread and had an impact that was more beneficial than expected. As the meditation practices had been in use for two to three terms, it could be concluded that the effects were due to engagement with the principles of meditation, rather than novelty effect. Of the four themes that emerged from the data, the first two (improvement in emotional regulation, a particularly pertinent life-skill for children in deprived areas, and an increased ability to focus/resist distractions) were the reasons for the initial uptake of meditation. The third and fourth themes (improved transition between lessons and a positive effect on whole-school culture for learning) were not anticipated prior to uptake. Both staff and students in all three schools wished to continue to develop meditation practices in the future. As one teacher said, ‘the impact – it’s like a switch has been turned. It’s like a huge weight has been lifted. It really has, in that short time, made a huge difference.’
References
Blakemore S-J and Frith U (2000) The Implications of Recent Developments in Neuroscience for Research on Teaching and Learning. London: The Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience.
Burke CA (2010) Mindfulness-based approaches with children and adolescents: A preliminary review of current research in an emergent field. Journal of Child and Family Studies 19(2): 133–144.
Clarke AM, Morreale S, Field CA et al. (2015) What works in enhancing social and emotional skills development during childhood and adolescence? A review of the evidence on the effectiveness of school-based and out-of-school programmes in the UK. WHO Collaborating Centre for Health Promotion Research, National University of Ireland, Galway. Available at: file:///C:/Users/Lee/Downloads/Review_of_Social_and_Emotional_Skills-Based_Intervention_Report_(WEB_VERSION).pdf (accessed 15 January 2019).
Hardiman M (2012) The Brain-Targeted Teaching Model for 21st Century Schools. Thousand Oakes: Corwin.
Harnett PH and Dawe S (2012) The contribution of mindfulness-based therapies for children and families and proposed conceptual integration. Child and Adolescent Mental Health 17(4): 195–208.
Immordino-Yang MH and Damasio A (2007) We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education 1(1): 3–10.
Kaunhoven RJ and Dorjee D (2017) How does mindfulness modulate self-regulation in pre-adolescent children? An integrative neurocognitive review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 74: 163–184.
OECD (2002) Understanding the Brain: Towards a New Learning Science. Paris: OECD.
Willis J (2006) Research-Based Strategies to Ignite Student Learning: Insights from a Neurologist and Classroom Teacher. Danvers, USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Wisner BL, Jones B and Gwin D (2010) School-based meditation practices for adolescents: A resource for strengthening self-regulation, emotional coping, and self-esteem. Children & Schools 32(3): 150–159.