Impact Journal Logo

Effective professional development at scale

Written by: Olivia Page
7 min read
Olivia Page, Director of Professional Development, Education for the 21st Century, UK Education for the 21st Century (E21C) is a medium-sized multi-academy trust (MAT) of eight schools (four primary and four secondary), based in London and the south-east of England, with over 6,000 pupils and 800 staff. The trust has been on a journey of transformation over the last three years, following a financial notice to improve in 2019. At E21C, our mission is to improve outcomes, transform lives and enable social mobility. This is because we know that these are the most important things that we can do to positively impact our community. As a body of staff, we achieve this through aligned autonomy, a clear backbone, strong culture, academic rigour and smart systems, underpinned by our values of trust, kindness and endeavour. In 2021, we were looking for a way in which to supercharge professional growth across our schools to support teacher development more effectively. As we came through

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's free for trainee teachers and half price for NQTs) or log in if you're already a member.

    • Bryk, A.S and Schneider, B (2002). Trust in schools: a core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    • Cohen J, Wong V, Krishnamachari A et al. (2020) Teacher coaching in a simulated environment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 42(2): 208–231.
    • Collin, J. and Smith, E (2021). Effective Professional Development: Guidance Report. Education Endowment Foundation.
    • Ericsson A and Pool R (2016) Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
    • Gibbons LK and Cobb P (2016) Content-focused coaching: Five key practices. The Elementary School Journal 117(2): 237–260.
    • Glover TA, Reddy LA, Kurz A et al. (2019) Use of an online platform to facilitate and investigate data-driven instructional coaching. Assessment for Effective Intervention 44(2): 95–103.
    • Gorozidis G and Papaioannou AG (2014) Teachers’ motivation to participate in training and to implement innovations. Teaching and Teacher Education 39: 1–11.
    • Guskey TR (2002) Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching 8(3): 381–391.
    • Hill HC, Papay JP, Schwartz N et al. (2021) A learning agenda for improving teacher professional learning at scale. Research Partnership for Professional Learning. Available at: https://annenberg.brown.edu/sites/default/files/rppl-agenda.pdf (accessed 4 December 2023).
    • Ippolito J (2010) Three ways that literacy coaches balance responsive and directive relationships with teachers. The Elementary School Journal 111(1): 164–190.
    • Joyce BR and Showers B (2002) Student Achievement Through Staff Development, vol. 3. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
    • Kennedy A (2014) Understanding continuing professional development: The need for theory to impact on policy and practice. Professional Development in Education 40(5): 688–697.
    • Marsh JA, Bush-Mecenas S, Strunk KO et al. (2017) Evaluating teachers in the Big Easy: How organizational context shapes policy responses in New Orleans. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 39(4): 539–570.
    • Power K and Goodnough K (2019) Fostering teachers’ autonomous motivation during professional learning: A self-determination theory perspective. Teaching Education 30(3): 278–298.
    • Reddy LA, Glover T, Kurz A et al. (2019) Assessing the effectiveness and interactions of instructional coaches: Initial psychometric evidence for the instructional coaching assessments–teacher forms. Assessment for Effective Intervention 44(2): 104–119.
    • Sweller J (2020) Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development 68(1): 1–16.
    5 1 vote
    Please Rate this content
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    0 Comments
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments

    From this issue

    Impact Articles on the same themes