Daniel Langley, Assistant Principal, Teaching and Learning at Milton Keynes Academy and EdD Candidate at IOE, UCL The promise of research-informed classroom practice is clear: benefit from the ‘best bets’ for improving student attainment, navigate the whims of political opinion and bolster teacher professionalism (Goldacre, 2013). The pursuit of this tempting state of affairs was rightly predicted by Rob Coe (1999) more than two decades ago and has since motivated a multitude of school leaders and teachers to engage with research and evidence. The idea that classroom practice should be research-informed for the benefit of students has been recognised at a policy level by the DfE (2018) and within the latest schools inspection framework (Ofsted, 2019). In this article, I aim to explore a range of barriers facing those seeking to implement research practically in the classroom. Secondly, I aim to use a case study from my own school to suggest ways in which two of these barriers
Embedding research-informed practice in the classroom: Overcoming the barriers to implementation
Written by: Daniel Langley
7 min read
- Ball JS (2003) The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy 18(2): 215–228.
- Beauchamp C and Beauchamp MC (2013) Boundary as bridge: An analysis of educational neuroscience literature from a boundary perspective. Educational Psychology Review 25(1): 47–67.
- Blakemore SJ (2019) Inventing Ourselves. London: Penguin.
- Burnard P and White J (2008) Creativity and performativity: Counterpoints in British and Australian education. British Educational Research 34(5): 667–682.
- Chi MTH (2021) Translating a theory of active learning: An attempt to close the research-practice gap in education. Topics in Cognitive Science 13(3): 441–463.
- Christodoulou JA and Gaab N (2009) Using and misusing neuroscience in education-related research. Cortex 45(4): 555–557.
- Coe R (1999) Manifesto for evidence-based education. Available at: https://f.hubspotusercontent30.net/hubfs/5191137/attachments/ebe/manifesto-for-ebe.pdf (accessed 20 February 2022).
- Creemers B, Kyriakides L and Antoniou P (2013) Teacher Professional Development for Improving the Quality of Teaching. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
- Crehan L (2016) Clever Lands. London: Unbound.
- Department for Education (DfE) (2018) Areas of research interest. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/publications/department-for-education-areas-of-research-interest (accessed 9 April 2021).
- Enser Z and Enser M (2021) The CPD Curriculum. Carmarthen: Crown House Publishing.
- Firestone A, Cruz R and Rodl J (2020) Teacher study groups: An integrative literature synthesis. Review of Educational Research 90(5): 675–709.
- Goldacre B (2013) Building evidence into education. Department for Education. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/news/building-evidence-into-education (accessed 10 May 2021).
- Hobbiss M, Sims S and Allen R (2021) Habit formation limits growth in teacher effectiveness: A Review of converging evidence from neuroscience and social science. Review of Education 9(1): 3–23.
- Howard-Jones PA (2014) Neuroscience and education: Myths and messages. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 15(12): 817–824.
- Howard-Jones PA, Jay T and Galeano L (2020) Professional development on the science of learning and teachers’ performative thinking – a pilot study. Mind, Brain and Education 14(3): 267–278.
- Kennedy M (2016) How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research 86(4): 945–980.
- Ofsted (2019) Education inspection framework: Overview of research. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/publications/education-inspec tion-framework-overview-of-research (accessed 12 March 2021).
- Rycroft-Smith L (2022) Knowledge brokering to bridge the research-practice gap in education: Where are we now? Review of Education 10(1): 43–91.
- Rycroft-Smith L and Stylianides A (2022) What makes a good educational research summary? A comparative judgement study of mathematics teachers’ and mathematics education researchers’ views. Review of Education 10(1): 1–42.
- Sancar R, Atal D and Deryakulu D (2021) A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education 101: 1–12.
- The Royal Society (2011) Brain Waves Module 2: Neuroscience: Implications for training and lifelong learning. Available at: https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/brain-waves/education-lifelong-learning (accessed 2 June 2020).
- Wiliam D (2016) Leadership for Teacher Learning: Creating a Culture Where all Teachers Improve so that All Students Succeed. West Palm Beach, FL: Learning Science International.