Joining the dots: Encouraging transfer of learning for student teachers

Written by: Georgina Gretton
8 min read
Georgina Gretton, School of Education, Liverpool John Moores University, UK At Liverpool John Moores University, we work alongside 400 primary student teachers each year. This case study focuses upon the creation and implementation of the ‘Reflection, Observation and Planning’ (ROP) initiative that is embedded as explicit sessions within our Professional Studies modules across both undergraduate and postgraduate routes.  The goal Our teacher training programmes consist of two linked components: taught sessions on campus and placement experiences in school. The teachers operating across these components as tutors and mentors have become what the Core Content Framework (CCF) (DfE, 2021) term ‘expert colleagues’. They have accrued what Dewey (1933) would deem ‘habits of mind’, which consists of thought patterns, frames of reference, expertise and grasp of pupil learning. This is what we hope to develop with our new teachers so that they too can develop a sense of agency, p

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's free for trainee teachers and half price for NQTs) or log in if you're already a member.

    • Ball SJ (2003) The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy 18(2): 215–228.
    • Bandura A (1977) Social Learning Theory. London: Prentice-Hall.
    • Biggs J (2011) Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
    • Davis J and Fantozzi V (2016) What do student teachers want in mentor teachers? Desired, expected, possible, and emerging roles. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning 24(3): 250–266.
    • Department for Education (DfE) (2021) ITT core content framework. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/974307/ITT_core_content_framework_.pdf (accessed 18 November 2022).
    • Dewey J (1933) How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the education process. New York: D.C. Heath.
    • Dreyfus SE (2004) The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 24(3): 177–181.
    • Kennedy M (2016) Parsing the practice of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education 67(1): 6–17.
    • Lave J and Wenger E (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • O’Leary M (2013) Classroom Observation: A Guide to the Effective Observation of Teaching and Learning. Oxon: Routledge.
    • Rolfe G, Freshwater D and Jasper M (2001) Critical Reflection in Nursing and the Helping Professions: A User’s Guide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Schon D (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple Smith.
    • Shulman LS (1986) Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher 15(2): 4–14.
    • Swan J (1993) Metaphor in action: The observation schedule in a reflective approach to teacher education. ELT Journal 47(3): 242–249.
    • Wragg EC (2011) An Introduction to Classroom Observation, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
    0 0 votes
    Please Rate this content
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    0 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments

    From this issue

    Impact Articles on the same themes