Impact Journal Logo

Reconsidering oracy: Improving paired discussions in a secondary history classroom

Written by: Helen Riddle
6 min read
HELEN RIDDLE, DIRECTOR OF TEACHING & LEARNING, ST DUNSTAN’S COLLEGE, UK Context Inspired by the Educational Endowment Foundation’s guidance report on improving literacy (Quigley and Coleman, 2021), our recent whole-school CPL (continuous professional learning) has focused on literacy. Staff chose one of three linked CPL sessions that responded to the EEF report: teaching targeted vocabulary (EEF recommendation 2), reading complex texts (recommendation 3) and oracy (recommendation 6). This differentiated for participants’ needs and interests (Cordingley et al., 2015) and followed Kennedy’s (2016) emphasis on combining content knowledge with broader pedagogical goals.  My department’s focus on oracy was something that we had not looked at closely, even though history lessons are often discursive and student talk featured regularly in lessons. Following the EEF’s recommendation of promoting high-quality talk as part of departmental training (Quigley and Coleman, 2021

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's free for trainee teachers and half price for NQTs) or log in if you're already a member.

    0 0 votes
    Please Rate this content
    Subscribe
    Notify of
    0 Comments
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments

    From this issue

    Impact Articles on the same themes

    Author(s): Bill Lucas