Impact Journal Logo

Taking curriculum seriously

Written by: Christine Counsell
9 min read
Curriculum is all about power. Decisions about what knowledge to teach are an exercise of power and therefore a weighty ethical responsibility. What we choose to teach confers or denies power. To say that pupils should learn ‘the best that has been thought and said’ is never adequate. Start the conversation, and questions abound: ‘Whose knowledge?’; ‘Who decides on “best”?’. Such questions reflect concern about whether schooling reproduces inequalities or interrupts them. Such questions matter. But reducing knowledge to voice will not get us far either. The contentious questions – Which works of literature? Which historical stories? Which art? – cannot be resolved by some optimal blend of diversity, some nirvana of neutrality, as though distribution across the sources of knowledge or types of knower will settle things. No matter how redemptive of former injustice, no holy grail of content selection will be reached. Nor does adding in preparation for the 21st

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's free for trainee teachers and half price for NQTs) or log in if you're already a member.

    4 2 votes
    Please Rate this content
    1 Comment
    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments

    […] •Key reading: Disciplinary (and substantive) knowledge – what are we really talking about? (Josh Vallance) •Wider reading 1: knowledge: independently necessary or collectively sufficient? (Michael Fordham) •Wider reading 2: “Reach out and touch knowledge” – Analysing curriculum in science with Legitimation Code Theory (Ruth Ashbee) •Wider reading 3: Taking curriculum seriously (Christine Counsell – in Impact) […]

    From this issue

    Impact Articles on the same themes

    Author(s): Beng Huat See