Helen Bilton, Professor of Outdoor Learning and Play, , UK Anastasia Rattigan, Senior Digital Learning Producer and Yen Tu Digital Learning Producer, University of Reading, UK Schools spend money and time on training their staff, commonly known as continuing professional development (CPD). But how often do they consider what might be the most appropriate learning environment for a particular group of learners and measure the impact on the staff’s working practices after the training has finished? Guskey’s (1994) model of professional development offers a particularly helpful and clear way of thinking about gauging the impact of training at different levels. The model asks you to consider these five levels of impact: participant reaction participant learning organisational support and change participant use of new knowledge and skills pupil learning outcome. To evaluate, one can start at either 1 or 5. By starting at 1, this is about evaluati
The impact of online CPD (for support staff) taken as a whole-school group
7 min read
- Blatchford P, Russell A and Webster R (2011) Reassessing the Impact of Teaching Assistant: How Research Challenges Practice And Policy, 1st ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Goodall J, Day C, Linday G et al. (2005) Evaluating the impact of continuing professional development. Research Report RR659. Department for Education and Skills. Available at: www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/37105733/evaluating-the-impact-of-continuing-professional-development-cpd (accessed 18 March 2022).
- Guskey TR (1994) Professional development in education: In search of the optimal mix. In: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, USA 4–8 April 1994. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.905.9336&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 18 March 2022).