What systemic barriers must be broken in teacher education and professional development to enhance diversity and inclusion?

Written by:
6 min read
TAREK EL BABA, MAKASSED UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT, LEBANON AND DAR AL FIKR SCHOOLS, SAUDI ARABIA This perspective piece examines systemic barriers to diversity and equity in teacher education and professional development, focusing on the lived experiences of underrepresented educators. Drawing on foundational theories and recent international research, it analyses the effects of unconscious bias, policy constraints and inequitable access to mentorship on recruitment, retention and career progression. The discussion highlights promising practices – including inclusive leadership, targeted mentoring and alternative entry routes – and makes policy-oriented recommendations for systemic reform. The argument centres on the need for teacher preparation and ongoing professional learning systems in order to embed equity as a core principle, creating sustainable pathways for a representative and resilient educator workforce. Introduction: Why equity in teacher education matters now Efforts to

Join us or sign in now to view the rest of this page

You're viewing this site as a guest, which only allows you to view a limited amount of content.

To view this page and get access to all our resources, join the Chartered College of Teaching (it's free for trainee teachers and half price for ECTs) or log in if you're already a member.

    • Achinstein B, Ogawa RT and Speiglman R (2004) Retaining teachers of color: A pressing problem and a potential strategy for ‘hard-to-staff’ schools. Review of Educational Research 74(2): 271–306.
    • Darling-Hammond L (2017) Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education 40(3): 291–309.
    • Department for Education (DfE) (2024) School workforce in England: Reporting year 2023. Available at: https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/school-workforce-in-england/2023 (accessed 27 November 2025).
    • Garcia A, Weiss E and Johnson M (2023) Racial diversity in the US teaching workforce. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
    • García SB and Ortiz AA (2013) The impact of professional development on educators’ practices and attitudes toward diversity. Journal of Teacher Education 64(2): 150–165.
    • Ingersoll R and May H (2011) The minority teacher shortage: Fact or fable? Phi Delta Kappan 93(1): 62–65.
    • Kohli R (2018) Unpacking internalized racism: Teachers of color striving for racially just classrooms. Race Ethnicity and Education 21(1): 128–144.
    • Ladson-Billings G.(1995) Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal 32(3): 465–491.
    • Macfarlane A, Macfarlane S and Webber M (2023) Culturally sustaining professional development for Māori educators. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 58(1): 45–63.
    • Miller P (2023) Leadership and diversity in English schools: Unfinished business. Management in Education 37(2): 71–79.
    • Ontario Ministry of Education (2014) Equity and inclusive education in Ontario schools: Guidelines for policy development and implementation. Available at: https://www2.yrdsb.ca/sites/default/files/migrate/files/inclusiveguide.pdf (accessed 19 August 2025).
    • Patel R and Green C (2024) Digital mentoring for teacher retention: A mixed-methods evaluation. Teaching and Teacher Education 137: 104356.
    • Petchauer E (2015) Passing as white: Race, shame, and success in teacher licensure testing events for Black preservice teachers. Race Ethnicity and Education 18(6): 834–857.
    • Sleeter CE (2017) Critical race theory and the whiteness of teacher education. Urban Education 52(2): 155–169.
    • Tan CY, Gümüş S, Xu N et al. (2025) A review of empirical research on equitable school leadership practices for students from low socioeconomic status backgrounds. Educational Review. DOI: 10.1080/00131911.2025.2526437.
    • Villegas AM and Irvine JJ (2010) Diversifying the teaching force: An examination of major arguments. Urban Review 42(3): 175–192.
    0 0 votes
    Please Rate this content
    0 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments

    From this issue

    Impact Articles on the same themes